As I understand it, the basic consensus was that we need to have at
least three different levels of support.

First, the Athena Configurations, would be standard "cookie cutter"
models identical to those in the cluster.  This is the "RFP" version.

This configuration is fully supported, and can be athenized without
any extra effort.

Second, there may be acceptable variations on the Athena
configurations.  For example, if we have used different disk drives in
the past, such variations may be listed as acceptable variations.
Systems with these variations can usually be athenized without any
extra effort, although the user takes responsibility for the
variations and MUST UNDERSTAND THAT WE DO NOT GUARANTEE SUPPORT IN THE
FUTURE!

Third, there are all other known and unknown variations.  These
configurations in general cannot be Athenized.  We do not guarantee
that they can be Athenized, nor do we in any way support them.  I.e.,
the user can buy them for their own purposes only.