Received: by ATHENA-PO-2.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA18290; Wed, 8 Mar 89 13:19:36 EST
Received: by ATHENA.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA16767; Wed, 8 Mar 89 13:13:59 EST
Received: by DORA.MIT.EDU (5.60/4.7) id AA02750; Wed, 8 Mar 89 13:13:36 EST
Message-Id: <8903081813.AA02750@DORA.MIT.EDU>
To: <bgardner@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Cc: video-hackers@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, mackay@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, russ@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 07 Mar 89 19:18:46 -0500.
             <8903080018.AA07080@PINK.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 89 13:13:34 EST
From: Chris D. Peterson <kit@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>


>     Is there any chance that it can be placed in X11-R2 or
> X11-R3 or X11-R4, etc. ?? 

I seriously doubt that it will ever become a standard part of X, it
is just too specialized.  Although it may become a standard part of
the video extensions.

> (At least in StaffTools ?)

That I can do.

if you use:

$ cc -I/mit/StaffTools/include ...

You will now get the video widget's header files.

I couldn't find an rt object module so VVideo.o is only in
/mit/StaffTools/vaxlib.  If one of you rt hackers will give me an 
RT version I will put it in RT lib.

> It would be *much* nicer to:
>  #include <VVideo.h>

actually 

#include <X11/VVideo.h>

					Cheers