Received: by ATHENA-PO-2.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA12215; Mon, 13 Mar 89 14:30:25 EST
From: <michon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Received: by ATHENA.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA14002; Mon, 13 Mar 89 14:30:37 EST
Received: by JASON.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA10711; Mon, 13 Mar 89 14:30:17 EST
Message-Id: <8903131930.AA10711@JASON.MIT.EDU>
To: bgardner@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, mackay@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, treese@ATHENA.MIT.EDU,
        schluss@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Cc: michon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Subject: videomail UI
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 89 14:30:15 EST

The more I think about a non-fixed message layout format,
the more worried I get.  A fixed layout may
not be as wickedly cool as tailorable one,however,
it has a lot of advantages.  It will be easier to use,
it will be faster to use and most importantly, it assures
that no part of the mail message will be hidden by overlapping
windows. A tiled windowing environment would solve obscured message
component problem, but Im not at all sure how intuitive it
would be to use. The content of the message, or at least a cue
to the all the content should be appearant at first glance.
Overlapping windows within the message format is going to
lead to more pain than gain.  

Whadayyathink?
						Brian
