Received: by ATHENA-PO-2.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA04392; Sun, 16 Jul 89 16:16:21 EDT
From: <jnrees@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Received: by ATHENA.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA23712; Sun, 16 Jul 89 16:16:17 EDT
Received: by E40-342-18.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA09068; Sun, 16 Jul 89 16:16:11 -0400
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 89 16:16:11 -0400
Message-Id: <8907162016.AA09068@E40-342-18.MIT.EDU>
To: bgardner@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <bgardner@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>'s message of Sun, 16 Jul 89 15:54:29 EDT <8907161954.AA01844@M11-111-2.MIT.EDU>
Subject: Fonts


	Unfortunately, having to resort to full fontnames sort-of
defeats the purpose of the new fontname format.  Portability was a
concern in the design of this; ie. your program could have
'hard-coded' fonts which specified only the font attributes you were
looking for, and the X server would come up with some appropriate
font, provided one existed.  But that font could be different across
different X servers.

	Well, I guess a 5 minute start-up time is annoying enough to
resort to full fontnames.

JIM

