Received: by ATHENA-PO-2.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA09901; Mon, 11 Sep 89 21:21:14 EDT
Received: by ATHENA.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA01769; Mon, 11 Sep 89 21:22:12 EDT
Received: by media-lab (5.57/4.8)  id AA12852; Mon, 11 Sep 89 21:19:31 EDT
Message-Id: <8909120119.AA12852@media-lab>
To: Michael Travers <mt@media-lab.media.mit.edu>
Cc: amt-students@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Inventions and proprietary information agreement 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 11 Sep 89 18:45:00 -0400.
             <19890911224505.2.MT@OUROBOROS.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 89 21:19:30 EDT
From: mob@media-lab.media.mit.edu


Your concern that we might be locked out of using what we had produced
is the main one I had in mind while I looked over the material.
Sponsors have the right to the intellectual property, some with
payment and some without.  Non-sponsors only get rights two years
after a patent has been filed; it may be earlier if sponsors release
their rights.  I believe the creators of the property should be
guaranteed the much the same rights to their research as are research
contract sponsors: no license fee, no royalty, and reasonable
sub-license rights.  As such, I am to the left of AlanR but I also
have realistic expectations of how far the Lab is willing to go.

Once we've figured out what to go for, how do we introduce this
request for recognition?

--Mario

