Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA01594; Sat, 30 Sep 95 12:04:35 EDT
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA17811; Sat, 30 Sep 95 12:04:06 EDT
Received: from amri.cisco.com (amri.cisco.com [198.92.29.50]) by hubbub.cisco.com (8.6.12/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with ESMTP id IAA02062; Sat, 30 Sep 1995 08:54:13 -0700
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (hubbub.cisco.com [198.92.30.32]) by amri.cisco.com (8.3/8.3) with ESMTP id GAA00363; Sat, 30 Sep 1995 06:30:41 -0700
Received: from scylla.sovam.com (scylla.sovam.com [192.216.212.97]) by hubbub.cisco.com (8.6.12/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with SMTP id CAA13072 for <vsta@cisco.com>; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 02:49:02 -0700
From: edd@arminco.com
Received: from arminco.com by scylla.sovam.com with SMTP id AA12770
  (5.67b8s3p1/IDA-1.5 for <vsta@cisco.com>); Fri, 29 Sep 1995 12:46:47 +0300
Subject: Re: bitblt 
To: vsta@cisco.com
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:47:08 +0300 (MMT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 460       
Sender: edd@arminco.com
Message-Id:  <9509291347.aa24227@arminco.com>

> >> problems.  Another concern is overkill.  It's relatively easy to write a
> >> conventional /dev/bitblt compared to a postscript engine, and is that extra
> >> functionality ever going to be used?
> >>
> >> rajat
> >
> >NeXt used to use postscript for its screen output. Horrid. Postscript is
> >terribly in-efficient.
> >

What?????? In-efficient??? have you ever worked on the next, guy?
Next still uses DPS, and Sun, DEC, HP also!


Regards,
Edgar.