Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA02069; Fri, 29 Sep 95 19:59:35 EDT
Received: from freefall.FreeBSD.ORG by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA15077; Fri, 29 Sep 95 19:59:08 EDT
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA07844
          ; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:54:35 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA07707
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:52:53 -0700
Received: from aztec.co.za (aztec.co.za [196.7.70.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA07698
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:52:49 -0700
Received: by aztec.co.za (Smail3.1.29.1 #2)
	id m0sypBh-000KefC; Sat, 30 Sep 95 01:49 EET
Message-Id: <m0sypBh-000KefC@aztec.co.za>
From: harverso@aztec.co.za (Tony Harverson)
Subject: ep Driver ?
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 01:49:52 +0200 (SAT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 440       
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Hey there all,

I was just wondering exactly what problems were being referred to when the ep drriver was marker as being known tgive trouble in the Freebsd.faq...

(In the past,  I'v found noone is tougher evaluating software than the team themselves... Some of the stuff they mark buggy is far less so than releases of certain unnamed os's ;)

Seriously, What exactly is the probelm with the driver ? Has this been fixed in 2.1 ?

Tony


