Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA08205; Tue, 5 Dec 95 05:45:55 EST
Received: from pad-thai.cam.ov.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA26886; Tue, 5 Dec 95 04:07:08 EST
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 95 04:07:08 EST
From: MAILER-DAEMON@MIT.EDU (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: Deferred: Bad file number
Message-Id: <9512050907.AA26886@MIT.EDU>
To: owner-kerberos@MIT.EDU

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
451 Mack@rus.uni-stuttgart.de... reply: read error
451 Mack@rus.uni-stuttgart.de... reply: read error
451 RSCHOTT@CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU... reply: read error
451 RSCHOTT@CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU... reply: read error
451 pfenning@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de... reply: read error
451 pfenning@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de... reply: read error
451 uk-kerberos@doc.ic.ac.uk... reply: read error
451 uk-kerberos@doc.ic.ac.uk... reply: read error
421 hub.ubc.ca.tcp... Deferred: Connection refused by hub.ubc.ca
>>> RCPT To:<DJMSYS@ritvax.isc.rit.edu>
<<< 553 unknown or illegal user: DJMSYS@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
550 DJMSYS@ritvax.isc.rit.edu... User unknown
451 Yves.Dherbecourt@der.edf.fr... reply: read error
451 Yves.Dherbecourt@der.edf.fr... reply: read error
421 california.sandia.gov.tcp... Deferred: Connection timed out during user open with california.sandia.gov
421 sun0.cs.plu.edu.tcp... Deferred: Connection timed out during user open with sun0.cs.PLU.edu
421 ornl.gov.tcp... Deferred: Connection refused by ornl.gov
451 Albert.Chang@cl.cam.ac.uk... reply: read error
451 Albert.Chang@cl.cam.ac.uk... reply: read error
421 telecheck.com.tcp... Deferred: Connection timed out during user open with mercury.telecheck.com
451 roland@technet.sg... reply: read error
451 roland@technet.sg... reply: read error

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from pad-thai.cam.ov.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA26661; Tue, 5 Dec 95 04:07:08 EST
Received:  by pad-thai.cam.ov.com (8.6.12/)
	id <EAA03851@pad-thai.cam.ov.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 1995 04:10:54 -0500
Received: from GATEWAY by pad-thai.cam.ov.com with netnews
	for kerberos-wrapper@cam.ov.com (kerberos@mit.edu)
To: kerberos@MIT.EDU
Date: 4 Dec 1995 10:35:22 GMT
From: aldini@zeus.csr.unibo.it (Alessandro Aldini mat.1193)
Message-Id: <49uita$o5i@sirio.cineca.it>
Organization: Cineca
Sender: usenet@cam.ov.com
Subject: Help about Kerberos (TGT request)

 I read from "Firewalls and Internet Security" about the Kerberos 
 Authentication System :
 Kerberos principals may obtain tickets for services from a special server
 known as the Ticket Granting Server (TGS). 
 The client "speaks" to TGS with a private key and he obtains this key at
 session-start time from KDC (key distribution centre). The client 
 makes a request to the KDC to obtain this key (and other information for
 the TGS) and the KDC reply with an encrypted messagge; the key used for this
 messagge is 
 the client private key, so the KDC must know the private key of every user.
 The client key is derived from a noninvertible transform of the user's
 typed password. I suppose that KDC uses a secret algorithm to obtain the
 private key from the password and every client knows his own password and
 key but not the algorithm password-to-key. Is it true ? Otherwise how can
 KDC know every client private key ?
 Please answer me in e-mail. Thank you for your help.
 CIAO, Alessandro.
 
