Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA19263; Thu, 7 Dec 95 02:11:38 EST
Received: from [206.112.192.127] by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA08008; Thu, 7 Dec 95 02:10:33 EST
Received: (from listadm@localhost) by liquor.cabi.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id AAA19880; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 00:13:06 -0500
Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 00:13:06 -0500
X-Sender: chapman@saul5.u.washington.edu
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 1995 21:12:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Randy Chapman <chapman@u.washington.edu>
To: java-linux@substance.blackdown.org
Subject: 24 bpp?! (Someone please test!)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.3.91l.951206210937.2216l-100000@saul5.u.washington.edu>
Foo: foo-bar
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-Id: <"nvAAD3.0.Ds4.VUdnm"@liquor>
Resent-From: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
X-Mailing-List: <java-linux@java.blackdown.org> archive/latest/656
X-Loop: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: java-linux-request@java.blackdown.org


I think I may have found why 16bpp is not happy on linux-java.

However, if I am right, 24bpp should work.

I cant test this... XF86 cant drive my S3 at the insane frequencies
needed to drive a fixed frequency tube at 24bpp *shrug*

Hopefully someone ehre can test this before I get back to hacking
in the enxt hour or so =)

Thanks!

--randy