Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA12790; Sun, 10 Dec 95 16:48:00 EST Received: from liquor.cabi.net by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA20586; Sun, 10 Dec 95 16:48:04 EST Received: (from listadm@localhost) by liquor.cabi.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id QAA16034; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 16:22:13 -0500 Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 16:22:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 16:21:13 -0500 Message-Id: <199512102121.QAA00246@bedroom.cabi.net> From: Karl Asha To: java-linux@java.blackdown.org Subject: Re: List traffic... In-Reply-To: References: <199512102033.PAA00293@bedroom.cabi.net> Resent-Message-Id: <"g1gXv3.0.8w3.Xzqom"@liquor> Resent-From: java-linux@java.blackdown.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/706 X-Loop: java-linux@java.blackdown.org Precedence: list Resent-Sender: java-linux-request@java.blackdown.org Steve Greene writes: > > > On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Karl Asha wrote: > > > Jim Bourne writes: > > > karl, > > > How about java-linux-faq list. Anyone has questions then they can just post > > > there. > > > just forwarding this back to the list...I like it. > > In spite of my previous message about list non-proliferation, I like it, too. > > How do we differentiate it versus java-linux? *-faq is where we put the > general-purpose newbie, setup, and howto stuff, while java-linux deals > with hard-core development issues? > > As an example, red-hat has 3 lists - redhat-list (general questions), > redhat-announce (moderated, meant for new product, critical bug > fixes, security alerts, and related announcements), and redhat-developer, > for stuff in the works. -announce is usually cross-posted to -list. Seems > to work OK. > > Steve Greene > sgreene@access.digex.net Well, java-linux-faq can serve for all setup related questions, etc..etc.., java-linux can serve for questions concerning port development, actual java coding questions, etc.., and java-linux-announce does just what it's mean to. At least that's my incredibly subjective opinion on the matter ;-) Cheers, Karl Asha karl@ncm.com