Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA20142; Tue, 19 Dec 95 22:16:14 EST Received: from pain.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA26145; Tue, 19 Dec 95 22:16:15 EST Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id VAA15512; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 21:49:51 -0500 Received: from fearsome.tjls.com by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA15494 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 21:41:39 -0500 Received: (from tls@localhost) by fearsome.tjls.com (8.7.1/8.6.12) id VAA00133 for netbsd-developers@netbsd.org; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 21:41:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 21:41:20 -0500 (EST) From: Thor Lancelot Simon Message-Id: <199512200241.VAA00133@fearsome.tjls.com> To: netbsd-developers@netbsd.org Subject: Should I commit the new if_de? Sender: owner-netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG Precedence: first-class X-Loop: netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG I've merged the few changes Matt hadn't already picked up back into the latest if_de.c that Matt sent me, which I imported last week. I'm currently using the new driver on my i386 machines and it seems to work fine. The Alpha port apparently doesn't use quite the same version of the driver as the i386, so I think the i386 is the only port affected by this. Would anyone like to test this out? Is there any reason not to commit it? Thor