Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!americast.com!americast.com!americast-post Newsgroups: americast.wpost From: americast-post@AmeriCast.Com Organization: American Cybercasting Approved: americast-post@AmeriCast.com Subject: Tank Farm Priorities= Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 07:35:20 EST Message-ID: <30.1992Nov21.073520@AmeriCast.com> Tank Farm Priorities= YOU'VE NO DOUBT heard about the Fairfax City petroleum tank farm and its huge leak, estimated at 200,000 gallons and 18 acres in size. Now, a commission named by Gov. L. Douglas Wilder says that the tank farm should be moved to another location because it con- stitutes an "unreasonable risk." But the commission did not sug- gest how to do it and provided few details about the size of the task. The tank farm supplies 40 percent of the Washington area's fuel needs. What does that amount to? When the deep water tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground, it dumped 11 million gallons of oil into the sea. The same amount of product arrives at and is trucked away from the Fairfax City facility every 3 1/2 days. In 1991 the tank farm received 100 times that amount - more than 1.1 billion gal- lons of petroleum. Although some of the gasoline, heating oil and kerosene arrive via a 32-inch underground pipe, most supplies are delivered by truck - 350 to 400 tanker trucks a day. That's a conservative estimate based on full loads for 8,500-gallon trucks. Smaller trucks are also used, and some large tankers do not carry full loads. This facility also supplies jet fuel directly to Dulles International Airport. We'd like to see the community that is ready and willing to accept such a thing near- by. All this also presupposes a willingness to move on the part of the Fairfax terminal oil companies (they don't want to) or a suc- cessful coercion of the same (no state or local law on the books can force them out). To condemn the facility, the state would have to buy it at full market value, and that is not an option at the moment. Even if the terminal is moved to another location sometime down the line, it is necessary first to address the sur- rounding community's most pressing problems. Cleanup efforts to date have been pathetic - just 371 of the 200,000 spilled gallons retrieved in one six-week period. Federal oversight and pressure have amounted to a slap on the wrist - one $205,000 fine for al- lowing a little contaminated water to flow into a stream. Star Enterprises, which has taken responsibility for cleaning up the spill, resumed its tank farm operations before an audit and search for leaks were even completed. State and local elected of- ficials would do well to deal with these situations first.<02:21 11-21C9999----- Copyright 1992, The Washington Post. This story is from the Washington Post's Capitol Edition On-Line and is not to be ar- chived or redistributed. For more information, send-email to American Cybercasting Cor- poration (usa@AmeriCast.COM)