5i' Recommendation Q.783 TUP TEST SPECIFICATION 1 Introduction This Recommendation contains a set of detailed tests for the Signalling System No. 7 Telephony User Part (TUP). These tests are intended to validate the protocol specified in Q.721-Q.724 Recommendations. This Recommendation conforms to Q.780 Recommendations which describes the basic rules of the test specification. 2 General principles of TUP tests The TUP tests aim at testing TUP protocol conformance in a given implementation. The tests are described as "Validation" tests or "Validation" and "Compatibility" tests. Each test description indicates in the field "type of test" whether the test is "Valida- tion" or "Validation" and "Compatibility". As the TUP also describes the required call control actions resulting from TUP mes- sage transfer the TUP tester also checks the result of those call control actions, e.g. that speech/information transfer is possible. 3 Test configuration A stable signalling relation is required between "SP A" and "SP B" in order to effectively test the TUP. In addition telephony circuits are required for some of the tests. 4 TUP test list All tests may be validation tests. Tests marked "*" are compa- tibility tests. Tests marked "fs" are for further study. 1 Circuit supervision * 1.1 Non allocated circuits 1.2 Reset of circuits 1.2.1 RSC received on an idle circuit 1.2.2 RSC sent on an idle circuit 1.2.3 Group reset received 1.2.4 Group reset sent 1.3 Blocking of circuits 1.3.1 Group blocking/unblocking 1.3.1.1 HGB received 1.3.1.2 HGB sent * 1.3.1.3 MGB received * 1.3.1.4 MGB sent 1.3.2 Circuit blocking/unblocking * 1.3.2.1 BLO received * 1.3.2.2 BLO sent * 1.3.2.3 Circuit blocking from both ends; removal of blocking from one end 1.3.2.4 Interruption for FDM circuits 1.4 Continuity check test call * 1.4.1 CCTC received: successful * 1.4.2 CCTC sent: successful 1.4.3 CCTC received: unsuccessful 1.4.4 CCTC sent: unsuccessful 1.5 Receipt of unreasonable signalling information 1.5.1 Received 2 Normal call set-up 2.1 Both way circuit selection * 2.1.1 IAM sent by controlling SP * 2.1.2 IAM sent by non controlling SP 2.2 Called address sending * 2.2.1 "en bloc" operation * 2.2.2 Overlap operation 2.3 Successful call set-up 2.3.1 Ordinary call (with various ACM and ANS) * 2.3.2 Call switched via satellite * 2.3.3 Test for echo suppressor call set-up * 2.3.4 Blocking and unblocking during a call (ini- tiated) * 2.3.5 Blocking and unblocking during a call (received) 3 Normal call release * 3.1 Calling party clears: before ACM * 3.2 Calling party clears: before ANS * 3.3 Calling party clears: after ANS * 3.4 Calling party clears: after CLEAR BACK * 3.5 Reanswer 4 Unsuccessful set-up 4.1 SEC 4.1.1 SEC received 4.1.2 SEC sent 4.2 CGC 4.2.1 CGCreceived 4.2.2 CGC sent 4.3 NNC 4.3.1 NNC received 4.3.2 NNC sent 4.4 ADI * 4.4.1 ADI received * 4.4.2 ADI sent 4.5 CFL 4.5.1 CFL received 4.5.2 CFL sent 4.6 SSB * 4.6.1 SSB received * 4.6.2 SSB sent 4.7 UNN * 4.7.1 UNN received * 4.7.2 UNN sent 4.8 LOS 4.8.1 LOS received 4.8.2 LOS sent 4.9 SST 4.9.1 SST received 4.9.2 SST sent 4.10 ACB 4.10.1 ACB received 4.10.2 ACB sent 4.11 DPN 4.11.1 DPN received 4.11.2 DPN sent 5 Abnormal situation during a call 5.1 Inability to release in response to a CLF 5.2 Inability to release in response to a backward signal 5.3 Timers 5.3.1 T2 5.3.2 T3 5.3.3 T4 5.3.4 T5 5.3.5 T6 * 5.3.6 ANS signal not received (Q.118 Timer) * 5.3.7 Delay in clearing by calling party (Q.118 Timer) 5.4 Reset of circuits during a call 5.4.1 Of an outgoing circuit 5.4.2 Of an incoming circuit 5.5 Receipt of unreasonable signalling information 5.5.1 (Now test No. 1.5.1) fs 5.5.2 Received 5.6 Interruption of signalling relation 6 Special call set-up 6.1 Continuity check call * 6.1.1 COT applied on an outgoing circuit * 6.1.2 COT applied on previous circuit * 6.1.3 COT on a satellite circuit 6.1.4 Calling party clears during a COT * 6.1.5 Delay of through connect 6.1.6 COT unsuccessful 6.1.7 COT received on incoming circuit 6.2 Automatic repeat attempt 6.2.1 Dual seizure 6.2.2 Circuit reset 6.2.3 Reception of unreasonable signal information * 6.2.4 Blocking of the circuit 6.2.5 Continuity check failure 6.3 Dual seizure 6.3.1 Dual seizure for controlling side 7 Supplementary services fs 7.1 CUG fs 7.2 User access to the calling line identity fs 7.3 User access to the called line identity fs 7.4 Redirection of calls fs 7.5 CCBS fs 7.6 Network access to calling line identity 8 Performance tests Note - For further study. Figure 1/Q.783, p. H.T. [T1.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Circuit supervision __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Non-allocated circuits } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a CIC relating to a circuit which does not exist, SP A will discard the message and alert maintenance personnel } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that the CIC identifies a circuit that does not exist between SP A and SP B } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- IAM __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP B to send an initial address message. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE INDICATION GIVEN TO THE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL? | | | | | | } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T1.783], p. H.T. [T2.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.15.1 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Reset of circuits _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: RSC received on an idle circuit } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a reset circuit signal SP A will respond by sending a release guard signal } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: The circuit is idle } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- RSC RLG -------------------------> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a reset-circuit signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T2.783], p. H.T. [T3.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.15.1 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Reset of circuits _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: RSC sent on an idle circuit } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate reset-circuit signal } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: The circuit is idle } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B RSC -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a reset-circuit signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T3.783], p. H.T. [T4.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.15.2 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Reset of circuits __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Group reset received } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5 seconds, SP A will respond by sending a circuit reset acknowledge message } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- GRS <------------------------- GRS GRA -------------------------> __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT GROUP IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T4.783], p. H.T. [T5.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.2.4 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.15.2 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Reset of circuits __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: Group reset sent __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a circuit group reset message } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B GRS -------------------------> GRS -------------------------> <------------------------- GRA __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT GROUP IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T5.783], p. H.T. [T6.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5.2 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: HGB received __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the hardware failure group blocking procedure can be correctly initiated } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- HGB <------------------------- HGB HBA -------------------------> <------------------------- HGU <------------------------- HGU HUA -------------------------> __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two hardware failure oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP B ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE HGB MESSAGE } 3. { Arrange for SP B to send two hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. } 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | Tableau [T6.783], p. H.T. [T7.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5.2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: HGB sent ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate both hardware failure oriented group blocking messages and hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B HGB -------------------------> HGB -------------------------> <------------------------- HGB HGU -------------------------> HGU -------------------------> <------------------------- HUA ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two hardware failure oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE HGB MESSAGE } 3. { Arrange for SP A to send two hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. } 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUIT INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | Tableau [T7.783], p. H.T. [T8.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.3 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: MGB received __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the maintenance oriented group blocking procedure can be correctly initiated } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- MGB <------------------------- MGB MBA -------------------------> <------------------------- MGU <------------------------- MGU MUA -------------------------> __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two maintenance oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP B ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE MGB MESSAGE } 3. { Arrange for SP B to send two maintenance oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. } 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | Tableau [T8.783], p. H.T. [T9.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.4 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: MGB sent __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate both maintenance oriented group blocking messages and maintenance oriented group unblocking messages } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B MGB -------------------------> MGB -------------------------> <------------------------- MGA MGU -------------------------> MGU -------------------------> <------------------------- MUA __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two maintenance oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE MGB MESSAGE } 3. { Arrange for SP A to send two maintenance oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. } 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUIT INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | Tableau [T9.783], p. H.T. [T10.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5.1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: BLO received _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the blocking/unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- BLO BLA -------------------------> <------------------------- UBL UBA -------------------------> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP B ON THIS CIRCUIT } 3. { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. } 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER EXCHANGE ON THIS CIRCUIT } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T10.783], p. H.T. [T11.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5.1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: BLO sent ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate blocking messages } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B BLO -------------------------> <------------------------- BLA UBL -------------------------> <------------------------- UBA ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THIS CIRCUIT } 3. { Arrange for SP A to send an unblocking signal. } 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THIS CIRCUIT } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | | | | } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T11.783], p. H.T. [T12.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.3 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5.1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Blocking from both ends: removal of blocking from one end } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the blocking/unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B BLO -------------------------> <------------------------- BLA <------------------------- BLO BLA -------------------------> UBL -------------------------> <------------------------- UBA <------------------------- UBL UBA -------------------------> ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THIS CIRCUIT } 3. { Arrange for SP B to send a blocking signal. } 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CANNOT BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY EITHER SP } 5. { Arrange for SP A to send an unblocking signal. } 6. { CHECK C: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED BY SP B } 7. { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. } 8. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T12.783], p. H.T. [T13.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.4 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 9.2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Interruption from FDM circuits } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify th at an interruption of the pilot in FDM system causes a blocking signal to be sent } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: The signa lling points must be linked by a transmission system using FDM } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B BLO -------------------------> <------------------------- BLA UBL -------------------------> <------------------------- UBA ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for the reception of the pilot signal at SP A to be interrupted more than 4-15 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT A CALL CANNOT BE INITIATED BY EITHER SP } 3. { Arrange for the interruption of the pilot tone to be terminated. } 4. { CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT A CALL CAN BE INITIATED BY EITHER SP AFTER A PERIOD OF 4-15 SECONDS } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T13.783], p. H.T. [T14.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.4.1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 7.5 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Continuity check test call } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: CCTC received: Successful } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly performed } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Circuit must be idle } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- CCR { | | (hy--------------------------------------- } Check tone { | fR | (hy--------------------------------------- } <------------------------- CLF RLG -------------------------> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T14.783], p. H.T. [T15.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.4.2 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 7.5 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Continuity check test call } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: CCTC sent: successful } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly performed } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Circuit must be idle } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B CCR -------------------------> Check Tone { ---------------------------------------- | | } { ---------------------------------------- | f | fR } CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T15.783], p. H.T. [T16.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.4.3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 7.5 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Continuity check test call } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: CCTC received: unsuccessful } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify tha t the continuity check procedure can be correctly received } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Ensure th at no backward check tone is detected within the specified time out } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A - SP B <------------------------- - CCR { | | (hy--------------------------------------- } - Check tone { | fR | (hy------- } <------------------------- - CCF | 1-3 minutes | T10 | <------------------------- - CCR { | | (hy--------------------------------------- } Check tone { | fR | (hy------- } <------------------------- - CCF | Maintenance staff alerted 1-3 minutes | T10 | <------------------------- - CCR { | | (hy--------------------------------------- } Check tone { | fR | (hy------------- } <------------------------- CCF ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK INITIATED WITHIN 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WERE THE MAINTENANCE STAFF ALERTED ON FAILURE OF THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE CHECK REPEATED AT INTERVALS OF 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | } 5. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T16.783], p. H.T. [T17.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.4.4 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 7.5.3 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Continuity check test call } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: CCTC sent: unsuccessful } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly invoked } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Ensure th at no backward tone is detected within the specified timeout } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B CCR -------------------------> Check tone { ---------------------------------------- | | } { -------------- | f | fR } CCF - -------------------------> { T10 | T10 | 1-3 minutes T10 | } CCR - -------------------------> Check tone { ---------------------------------------- | | } { --------------- | f | fR } CCF - -------------------------> { T10 | T10 | 1-3 minutes T10 | } Maintenance staff alerted CCR - -------------------------> Check tone { ---------------------------------------- | | } { --------------- | f | fR } CCF -------------------------> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK INITIATED WITHIN 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WERE THE MAINTENANCE STAFF ALERTED ON FAILURE OF THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE CHECK REPEATED AT INTERVALS OF 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | } 5. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T17.783], p. H.T. [T18.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 1.5.1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 6.5 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Receipt of unreasonable information } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: Received _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the action taken by a signalling point upon receipt of unreasonable signalling information is as stated in Q.724 S 6.5 } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Arrange the data in signalling point B such that CLF, RLG, and UBL messages may be initiated b) The circuit should be idle and unblocked } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B a) <------------------------- CLF RLG -------------------------> b) <------------------------- RLG c) <------------------------- UBL UBA -------------------------> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a clear forward signal. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN a) ABOVE? | | | | | | } 4. { Arrange for SP B to send a release guard signal. } 5. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 6. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN b) ABOVE? | | | | | | } 7. { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. } 8. { CHECK E: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 9. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN c) ABOVE? | | | | | | } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note - This test covers only some of the ambiguous messages which could be received. Tableau [T18.783], p. H.T. [T19.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Both way circuit selection } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: IAM sent by controlling SP } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate an outgoing call on a circuit capable of bothway operation when the controlling SP is A } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) Circuit selected is capable of bothway operation c) Circuit selected is as in test number 2.1.2 d) SP A is the controlling signalling point } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A TO SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T19.783], p. H.T. [T20.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.1.2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Bothway circuit selection } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: IAM sent by non-controlling SP } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate an outgoing call on a circuit capable of bothway operation when the non-controlling SP is A } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) Circuit selected is capable of bothway operation c) Circuit selected is as in test number 2.1.1 d) SP B is the controlling signalling point } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T20.783], p. H.T. [T21.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.2.1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Called address sending } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: "EN BLOC" operation } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that a call can be successfully established (all digits included in the IAM) } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The exchange data is arranged such that all digits are included in the IAM } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 8. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction Where SPA is in a position to know, by digit analysis that the final digit has been sent. Confirm that an End-of-pulsing (ST) signal is included in the IAM. } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T21.783], p. H.T. [T22.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Called address sending } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Overlap operation (with SAM and SAO) } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate a call using an IAM followed by SAM and a SAO } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that digits are generated in an IAM followed by a SAM and a SAO } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> SAM -------------------------> SAO -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 8. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. Note - The message flow may not be as above (There may be various SAMs and SAOs). } { Where SPA is in a position to know by digit analysis that the final digit has been sent. Confirm that an end-of-pulsing (ST) signal is included in the last address message. } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T22.783], p. H.T. [T23.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.3.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.6 and 1.10 } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Successful call set-up } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Ordinary call (with various ACM and ANS) } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that a call can be successfully completed using various combinations of address complete messages and answer messages } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 8. { Repeat steps 1-7 with all combinations of bits A&B in the address complete message. } 9. { Repeat steps 1-8 with ANC replaced with an ANN. } 10. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T23.783], p. H.T. [T24.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.3.2 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Successful call set-up } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Call switched via a satellite } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify the satellite indicator in the initial address message is correctly set } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that the call is switched via a satellite connection or has a satellite connection already included in the path } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | | } 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 8. { CHECK E: WAS THE SATELLITE INDICATOR BIT IN THE IAM SET TO 1? | | | | | | } 9. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction? | | | | | | } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T24.783], p. H.T. [T25.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 11 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Successful call set-up } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Test for echo suppressor call set-up } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that a call can be successfully established with the inclusion of echo suppressors } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that the call is routed over a route requiring echo suppressors or already has an echo suppressor included in the connection } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { CHECK C: IS ECHO PERCEIVED BY EITHER PARTY? | | | | | | } 6. { The calling party should clear the call. } 7. { CHECK D: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 8. { CHECK E: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 9. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE INDICATOR BIT G (OUTGOING HALF ECHO SUPPRESSOR INCLUDED) IN THE IAM SET TO 1? | | | | | | } 10. { CHECK G: WAS THE MESSAGE INDICATOR BIT D (INCOMING HALF ECHO SUPPRESSOR INCLUDED) IN THE ACM SET TO 1? | | | | | | } 11. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T25.783], p. H.T. [T26.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Successful call set-up } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Blocking and unblocking during a call (initiated) } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the circuit blocking and unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated during a call } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech BLO -------------------------> <------------------------- BLA CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG UBL -------------------------> <------------------------- UBA ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { SP A should initiate circuit blocking relating to the circuit used for this call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 7. { The calling party should clear the call. } 8. { CHECK D: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY SP A? | | | | | | } 9. { SP A should send an unblocking signal. } 10. { CHECK E: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP. } 11. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 12. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } { Note - The blocking signal may be generated after the call has cleared. } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T26.783], p. H.T. [T27.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 2.3.5 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 5 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { TITLE: Successful call set-up } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Blocking and unblocking during a call (received) } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the circuit blocking and unblocking procedure can be correctly received during a call } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech <------------------------- BLO BLA -------------------------> CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG <------------------------- UBL UBA -------------------------> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { SP B should initiate circuit blocking relating to the circuit used for this call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 7. { The calling party should clear the call. } 8. { CHECK D: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY SP B? | | | | | | } 9. { SP B should send an unblocking signal. } 10. { CHECK E: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP. } 11. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 12. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } { Note - The blocking signal may be generated after the call has cleared. } ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T27.783], p. H.T. [T28.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 3.1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.14 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Normal call release ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Calling party clears before address complete } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call prior to receipt of an address complete message } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { The calling party should clear the call prior to receipt of the address complete signal. } 3. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 5. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T28.783], p. H.T. [T29.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 3.2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.14 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Normal call release ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Calling party clears before answer } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call prior to receipt of answer } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The calling party should clear the call prior to receipt of an answer signal. } 4. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 6. { For validation testing this test should be repeated in the reverse direction. } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T29.783], p. H.T. [T30.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 3.3 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.14 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Normal call release ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Calling party clears after answer } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call in the speech state } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 8. { For validation testing this test should be repeated in the reverse direction. } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T30.783], p. H.T. [T31.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 3.4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.14 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Normal call release ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Called party clears } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call in the clear back state } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech <------------------------- CBK CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The called party should clear the call. } 6. { The calling party should clear the call. } 7. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 8. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 9. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. } ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T31.783], p. H.T. [T32.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 3.5 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.14 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Normal call release _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { SUBTITLE: Called party clears and reanswers } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the called subscriber can successfully clear and reanswer a call in the speech state } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ACM { | | fR ---------------------------------------- } Ringing tone <------------------------- ANC Speech { ------------- } Speech <------------------------- CBK <------------------------- RAN Speech { ------------- } Speech CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } 3. { The called party should answer the call. } 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 5. { The called party should clear the call. } 6. { The called party should reanswer the call. } 7. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } 8. { The calling party should clear the call. } 9. { CHECK D: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 10. { CHECK E: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } 11. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T32.783], p. H.T. [T33.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.1.1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.8 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: SEC _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: SEC received _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a switching equipment congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that switching equipment congestion is returned to the request } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- SEC CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence with a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T33.783], p. H.T. [T34.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.1.2 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.8 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: SEC _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: SEC sent _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a switching equipment congestion message } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP A such that switching equipment congestion is returned to the call request } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- IAM SEC -------------------------> <------------------------- CLF RLG -------------------------> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence with a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | Tableau [T34.783], p. H.T. [T35.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.2.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.8 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: CGC __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: CGC received __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that a call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a circuit group congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that a circuit group congestion signal is returned to the call request } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- CGC CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note 1 - An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a CGC signal is sent. } { Note 2 - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T35.783], p. H.T. [T36.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.2.2 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.8 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: CGC _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: CGC sent _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a circuit group congestion signal } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point A such that a circuit group congestion signal is returned to the call request } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- IAM CGC -------------------------> <------------------------- CLF RLG -------------------------> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note 1 - An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a CGC signal is sent. } { Note 2 - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T36.783], p. H.T. [T37.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.3.1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q. 724 S 1.8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: NNC ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: NNC received ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a national network congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP B such that a national network congestion signal is returned to the call request } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- NNC CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note 1 - An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a NNC signal is sent. } { Note 2 - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T37.783], p. H.T. [T38.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.3.2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: NNC ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: NNC sent ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a national network congestion signal } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point A such that a national network congestion signal is returned to the call request, where SP A is now an I/C exchange } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- IAM NNC -------------------------> <------------------------- CLF RLG -------------------------> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note 1 - An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a NNC signal is sent. } { Note 2 - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T38.783], p. H.T. [T39.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.4.1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.7 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: ADI _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: ADI received _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an address incomplete message the call is immediately released and the correct indication given to the calling party } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling point B should be able to determine that the proper number of digits has not been received } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- ADI CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B, but do not enter the final digit. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE CORRECT TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT SENT TO THE CALLING SUBSCRIBER? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | Tableau [T39.783], p. H.T. [T40.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.4.2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 1.7 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: ADI _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: ADI sent _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate an address incomplete signal } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A should be able to determine that the proper number of digits has not been received } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | | TYPE OF SP: SP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- IAM ADI -------------------------> <------------------------- CLF RLG -------------------------> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Make a call from SP B to SP A, but do not enter the final digit. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE CORRECT TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT SENT TO THE CALLING SUBSCRIBER? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T40.783], p. H.T. [T41.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.5.1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 6.3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: CFL ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: CFL received ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a call failure signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that a call failure signal is returned to the call request } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B IAM -------------------------> <------------------------- CFL CLF -------------------------> <------------------------- RLG ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CALL IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note 1 - An address complete signal may be sent in the backward direction before a CFL signal is sent. } { Note 2 - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T41.783], p. H.T. [T42.783] TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST NUMBER: 4.5.2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE: Q.724 S 6.3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: CFL ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBTITLE: CFL sent ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a call failure signal } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP A such that a call failure signal is returned to the call request } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONFIGURATION: 1 | | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | | TYPE OF SP: SP ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: SP A SP B <------------------------- IAM CFL -------------------------> <------------------------- CLF RLG -------------------------> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CALL IDLE? | | | | | | } 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } { Note 1 - An address complete signal may be sent in the backward direction before a CFL signal is sent. } { Note 2 - It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | Tableau [T42.783], p.