Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA15491; Fri, 24 Nov 95 11:21:47 EST
Received: from pain.csrv.uidaho.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA06870; Fri, 24 Nov 95 11:20:49 EST
Received: from pain.csrv.uidaho.edu (fn@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pain.csrv.uidaho.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA03120 for <proven@mit.edu>; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 08:21:47 -0800
Message-Id: <199511241621.IAA03120@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>
To: proven@MIT.EDU
Subject: possible bug in pthreads/stdio/scanf.c, list sub request.
X-Web: <"http://www.hungry.com:8000/">
X-Os: 4.4BSD derivatives.
X-Disclaimer: THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF AT&T
X-At&T: YOU WILL
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Id: <3107.817230100.1@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 08:21:43 -0800
From: Faried Nawaz <fn@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>

Hi,

I noticed that pthreads-1_60_beta4_1/stdio/scanf.c has


	.
	.
	.
	flockfile(stdin);
	ret = __svfscanf(stdin, fmt, ap);
	flockfile(stdin);
	.
	.
	.

Should the second flockfile(stdin) be funlockfile(stdin) ?  I couldn't
find any mention of this on the pthreads-bug list archive.


Also, could you please subscribe me (nawaz921@cs.uidaho.edu) to the
pthreads mailing list?



Thanks,

faried.