Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA13782; Sat, 2 Dec 95 04:58:28 EST Received: from pain.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA11422; Sat, 2 Dec 95 04:57:10 EST Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id EAA05156; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 04:22:51 -0500 Received: from toccata.fugue.com by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA05137 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 04:13:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (mellon@localhost) by toccata.fugue.com (8.6.9/8.6.11) with SMTP id BAA04999; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 01:10:42 -0800 Message-Id: <199512020910.BAA04999@toccata.fugue.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: port-i386@NetBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ASUS P55TP4 motherboard experiences? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Dec 1995 22:46:34 PST." <25770.817886794@time.cdrom.com> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1995 01:10:40 -0800 From: Ted Lemon Sender: owner-port-i386@NetBSD.ORG Precedence: list X-Loop: port-i386@NetBSD.ORG > Triton seems to be the state of the art in P5 motherboard technology > these days, albeit with a few flaws (like lack of memory parity). Ouch. So can anybody recommend a different PCI motherboard that *has* parity? After looking over the ASUS page and the Intel page, it looks like anything that supports EDO memory doesn't support parity. Sigh. The really depressing thing is that after reading over the ASUS archives, it looks like most people who ask about parity actually want to know if they *have* to buy parity memory, or if non-parity memory will do. Duh. :'( _MelloN_