Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA19185; Sat, 2 Dec 95 11:03:03 EST
Received: from freefall.FreeBSD.ORG by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA18000; Sat, 2 Dec 95 11:02:00 EST
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id GAA25757
          ; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 06:30:43 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id GAA25398
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 06:27:22 -0800
Received: from ivory.lm.com (ivory.lm.com [192.231.221.9])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA25393
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 06:27:19 -0800
Received: (from peterb@localhost) by ivory.lm.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA12138; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 09:33:07 -0500
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 09:33:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Peter Berger <peterb@telerama.lm.com>
X-Sender: peterb@ivory.lm.com
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: User mode PPP vs. Kernel
In-Reply-To: <199512020042.RAA06141@intele.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.BSI.3.91.951202093156.12090A-100000@ivory.lm.com>
X-Mentos: The Freshmaker!
X-Request-Do: resolve
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Is there any hard data on the difference in performance between user mode 
PPP and kernel mode?  I remember louis mamakos package way back when used 
much more CPU ....

Thanks

By the way, I have changed jobs -- I'm now at the Pittsburgh 
Supercomputing Center, so if you see messages from either address, it's 
still me....

"The law locks up both man and woman / Who steals the goose from off the common,
But lets the greater felon loose / Who steals the common from the goose." -anon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Peter Berger - peterb@telerama.lm.com - http://www.lm.com/~peterb

