Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA03258; Sat, 2 Dec 95 16:04:57 EST
Received: from freefall.FreeBSD.ORG by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA03615; Sat, 2 Dec 95 16:03:53 EST
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA06741
          ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 08:20:12 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA06515
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 08:19:01 -0800
Received: from tombstone.sunrem.com ([199.104.90.54])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA06507
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 08:18:54 -0800
Received: (from brandon@localhost) by tombstone.sunrem.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA01292; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 09:17:22 GMT
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 09:17:20 +0000 ()
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com>
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.0.5 and Netscape Commerce Server 
In-Reply-To: <1236.817793135@westhill.cdrom.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951201091457.1281B-100000@tombstone.sunrem.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 30 Nov 1995 gpalmer@westhill.cdrom.com wrote:
> Yes, 2.0.5 can run the Netscape Commerce server. Check out
> https://www-secure.cdrom.com/ :-) Okay, that's a 2.1 box now, but
> there aren't THAT many differences between 2.0.5 and 2.1.

Question, I grabbed the 60 day trial commerce server for BSDi, everything
worked fine except for the fact that I could not generate a key (boggle?). 
The program would run (makekey, I think was the name), I would randomly 
type until it was 'filled up' with key sequences, at which point it would 
print saying 'Press Enter to continue', and I would, but nothing.  The 
process was essentially hung as it was taking up 0% CPU etc.  I let it 
run for several hours, for naught.  Any ideas?

Doesn't matter too much now though, since Apache has SSL and should soon 
have https (crosses fingers).

-Brandon Gillespie-

