Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA07777; Tue, 12 Dec 95 23:46:59 EST
Received: from liquor.cabi.net by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA20791; Tue, 12 Dec 95 23:47:01 EST
Received: (from listadm@localhost) by liquor.cabi.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA03216; Tue, 12 Dec 1995 15:37:09 -0500
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 15:37:09 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 15:14:43 -0500
Message-Id: <199512122014.PAA01504@bedroom.cabi.net>
From: Karl Asha <karl@ncm.com>
To: Tim Bass <bass@dune.silkroad.com>
Cc: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
Subject: Re: Reasoning for Creation of Second List
In-Reply-To: <199512122040.PAA05471@dune.silkroad.com>
References: <199512121929.OAA06105@bedroom.cabi.net>
	<199512122040.PAA05471@dune.silkroad.com>
Resent-Message-Id: <"BsxK_3.0.8n.8TUpm"@liquor>
Resent-From: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
X-Mailing-List: <java-linux@java.blackdown.org> archive/latest/725
X-Loop: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: java-linux-request@java.blackdown.org

Tim Bass writes:
 > > 
 > > This is a mighty speech from someone who was not entirely certain of
 > > his perception of the situation ;-)
 > 
 > Karl,  I have been reading your self-absorbed egotistical posts
 > for quite some time now.  I would be much more mature of you
 > if you might stop insulting others indirectly and then putting
 > your little ;-) after each quip.
 > 
 > Running a listserver is not the work of a genius and certainly
 > does not make you a god among men.  I suggest you would be
 > much more effective if you would come down off your 'high horse'
 > and join the rest of us humans.  If you think that somehow
 > Karl Asha is much more qualified, clever, or more experienced
 > in networking that Tim Bass, then let's just let it all hang
 > out here on the net.

Lets not, we both run lists I believe :)

 > Otherwise, I alread stated that I would support your list if
 > you can keep it working and it's not on the end of a routing
 > loop.  Your constant ;-) and ;-) that attitude is more
 > disturbing.
 > 
 > BTW genius, the source code for the Java JDK cannot be freely
 > available, as you blatently suggested.  It is licensed from
 > Sun and all who received the JDK source must have signed an
 > agreement.  It cannot legally be available for FTP.

The port is available, my friend, the port.
 
 > If you insist on fighting me in public, then go for it.  If you
 > chose to fight off-line go for it.  But your arrogance is uncalled for.
 > 
 > Tim

Nah, I'm tiny, I'd lose ;-)

Cheers, 
Karl Asha
karl@ncm.com

