Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA03979; Wed, 13 Dec 95 14:55:56 EST Received: from pain.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA06182; Wed, 13 Dec 95 14:55:59 EST Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA08659; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 14:09:11 -0500 Received: from jekyll.piermont.com by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA08651 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 14:05:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (perry@localhost) by jekyll.piermont.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA02307; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 14:05:46 -0500 Message-Id: <199512131905.OAA02307@jekyll.piermont.com> X-Authentication-Warning: jekyll.piermont.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: jconklin@netcom.com (J.T. Conklin) Cc: netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pmax query In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Dec 1995 11:01:04 PST." <199512131901.LAA03158@netcom23.netcom.com> Reply-To: perry@piermont.com X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 14:05:42 -0500 From: "Perry E. Metzger" Sender: owner-netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG Precedence: first-class X-Loop: netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG J.T. Conklin writes: > > Okay, so the executables are larger because of the lack of shared > > libraries, but what of the old/ directory? What is it? Do we need it? > > It makes the difference between fitting the distribution on a CD and > > not fitting it. > > I believe (but am not sure) that it is the snapshot I downloaded from > Arne before dowfore Jonathan uploaded the "real" 1.1. If that is the case, should it be blown away? Anything else like this still in the tree? > Jonathan? .pm