Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA17591; Tue, 19 Dec 95 14:06:49 EST Received: from pain.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA01226; Tue, 19 Dec 95 14:06:47 EST Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id NAA09118; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:29:32 -0500 Received: from lestat.nas.nasa.gov by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA09055 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:25:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (thorpej@localhost) by lestat.nas.nasa.gov (8.6.12/NAS.6.1) with SMTP id KAA00834; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 10:24:54 -0800 Message-Id: <199512191824.KAA00834@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> X-Authentication-Warning: lestat.nas.nasa.gov: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: perry@piermont.com Cc: netbsd-developers@netbsd.org Subject: Re: i386 pio.h 2.7.2 lossage Reply-To: Jason Thorpe From: Jason Thorpe Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 10:24:54 -0800 Sender: owner-netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG Precedence: first-class X-Loop: netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG On Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:20:53 -0500 "Perry E. Metzger" wrote: > However, we *should* be using it. It looks like a lot of the bugs are > pretty simple if one actually understands things like the constraint > syntax used by gcc's extended asm's, which I don't... Sigh... Well, we should, but we can't in the general case, anyhow. I.e. out current libg++ doesn't build with it, for certain. (At least, not on my m68k platforms.) As for the asm() stuff, I suppose I could pull out my gcc manual. But, then again, anyone could. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912 NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935 Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939