Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA24377; Tue, 19 Dec 95 15:22:09 EST
Received: from pain.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA26458; Tue, 19 Dec 95 15:22:10 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA09669; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:49:27 -0500
Received: from toccata.fugue.com by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA09658 for <netbsd-developers@netbsd.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:43:34 -0500
Received: from localhost (mellon@localhost) by toccata.fugue.com (8.6.9/8.6.11) with SMTP id LAA03935; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:43:14 -0800
Message-Id: <199512191943.LAA03935@toccata.fugue.com>
To: perry@piermont.com
Cc: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>, netbsd-developers@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: the state of PRs. 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:39:56 EST."
             <199512191839.NAA24430@jekyll.piermont.com> 
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:43:13 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Sender: owner-netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG
Precedence: first-class
X-Loop: netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG


> Here is a strawman to get rid of a whole year's worth of PRs: maybe we
> ought to parcel out the very oldest pr's (say, the 100 oldest) to the
> members of the developers list. That ends up being two (or three at
> most) PRs each -- hardly an ominous burden or more than a single
> individual can track.

Hm.  This sounds like a good idea, and I'd certainly be willing to do
my part.  However, my impression is that checkins to the tree by
non-core people (outside of the ports) are not welcome.  So this still
leaves the core on the critical path.

			       _MelloN_