Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA23843; Tue, 19 Dec 95 23:51:12 EST Received: from pain.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA00689; Tue, 19 Dec 95 23:51:12 EST Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id XAA16036; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 23:11:03 -0500 Received: from lestat.nas.nasa.gov by pain.lcs.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA15741 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 22:53:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (thorpej@localhost) by lestat.nas.nasa.gov (8.6.12/NAS.6.1) with SMTP id TAA03142; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 19:52:18 -0800 Message-Id: <199512200352.TAA03142@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> X-Authentication-Warning: lestat.nas.nasa.gov: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Gordon Ross" Cc: netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG Subject: Re: check-in policy? Reply-To: Jason Thorpe From: Jason Thorpe Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 19:52:18 -0800 Sender: owner-netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG Precedence: first-class X-Loop: netbsd-developers@NetBSD.ORG On Tue, 19 Dec 95 16:18:12 EST "Gordon W. Ross" wrote: > We have had "half done" things checked in on several occasions. Yes, we have. > It might help to clarify what the policy should be about requirements > for things that get checked in. For example, I would generally hope > that things are checked in only after they actually WORK, or at least > show improvement over what was there before. I agree 100%. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912 NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935 Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939