Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA01564; Wed, 20 Dec 95 05:44:38 EST
Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA10513; Wed, 20 Dec 95 05:44:39 EST
Received: from freefall.FreeBSD.ORG by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM)
	id AA20349; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 05:44:37 -0500
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA07561
          Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA07530
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA07522
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:53:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id JAA06800; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:51:05 +0100
Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP
	id JAA29075; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:50:59 +0100
Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id JAA08624; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:45:10 +0100
From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Message-Id: <199512200845.JAA08624@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Subject: Re: General comments on 2.1 install
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:45:10 +0100 (MET)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers)
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
In-Reply-To: <20832.819405815@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Dec 19, 95 12:43:35 pm
X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > What's the exact error that's returned?  I could think of two problems:
> 
> Basically, the error that occurs is that all attempts to access
> /dev/fd0, post umount(..., MNT_FORCE), return -1 for the open (I'm not
> sure what errno is set to - I can check).  If I launch the shell after
> the chroot happens, this does not occur.

Yes, the errno would be of interest.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
