Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA26779; Tue, 26 Dec 95 23:36:18 EST
Received: by MIT.EDU 
	id AA12438; Tue, 26 Dec 95 23:36:11 EST
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 95 23:36:11 EST
From: MAILER-DAEMON@MIT.EDU (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: Cannot send message for 3 days
Message-Id: <9512270436.AA12438@MIT.EDU>
To: <owner-kerberos@MIT.EDU>
To: proven@PO7.LOCAL
To: tytso@PO9.LOCAL
To: basch@lehman.com
To: jis@E40-PO.LOCAL
To: tlyu@PO9.LOCAL

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
421 pyro.rh.imsa.edu.tcp... Deferred: Connection timed out during user open with pyro.rh.imsa.edu
451 hangman@pyro.rh.imsa.edu... Cannot send message for 3 days
hangman@pyro.rh.imsa.edu... Cannot send message for 3 days

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from pad-thai.cam.ov.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA08085; Sat, 23 Dec 95 23:22:36 EST
Received:  by pad-thai.cam.ov.com (8.6.12/)
	id <XAA29126@pad-thai.cam.ov.com>; Sat, 23 Dec 1995 23:25:31 -0500
Received: from GATEWAY by pad-thai.cam.ov.com with netnews
	for kerberos-wrapper@cam.ov.com (kerberos@mit.edu)
To: kerberos@MIT.EDU
Date: 23 Dec 1995 00:05:05 GMT
From: schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz)
Message-Id: <SCHWARTZ.95Dec22190505@galapagos.cse.psu.edu>
Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng
Sender: usenet@cam.ov.com
References: <4bbpu4$okr@kocrsv08.delcoelect.com>
Subject: Re: Kerberos Installed Base Stats

swlodin@delcoelect.com (Steve Lodin) writes:
| I heard from a Kerberos vendor at a recent computer security
| conference that the installed base of Kerberos is about 90% Kerberos
| Version 4 and 10% Kerberos Version 5.

That sounds reasonable.  V5 has been shaky in beta, not to mention
suffering from bloat compared to V4.

Around here there are 100,000 principles using V4 (AFS version) in
production, and three principles using V5 from MIT just to try it out.
The AFS users might switch to DCE someday, while a couple of
departments are now looking at SSH and avoiding Kerberos altogether.
