Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA29423; Thu, 28 Dec 95 22:12:45 EST Received: from xr3.atlas.fr by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA06523; Thu, 28 Dec 95 22:12:37 EST Received: from atlas.fr by xr3.atlas.fr id <23729-2@xr3.atlas.fr>; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:10:59 +0100 X400-Received: by /PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:08:05 +0100 X400-Received: by mta xr3.atlas.fr in /PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:08:05 +0100 X400-Received: by /ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:07:25 +0100 X400-Received: by /PRMD=CCETT/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 03:58:14 +0100 X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=CCETT/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/;820205894@rmts.ccett.fr] From: helpdesk@atlas.fr To: owner-kerberos@MIT.EDU Subject: Delivery Report (failure) for Jose.Kahan@ccett.fr Message-Type: Delivery Report Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:10:59 +0100 Message-Id: <"820205894@rmts.ccett.fr"@atlas.fr> Content-Identifier: kerberos/bind? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---Multi-Part-Message-Level-1-1-24292" Mime-Version: 1.0 -----Multi-Part-Message-Level-1-1-24292 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" This report relates to your message: kerberos/bind? of Thu, 28 Dec 1995 01:02:15 +0100 Your message was not delivered to Jose.Kahan@ccett.fr for the following reason: Message rejected due to congestion ***** The following information is directed towards the local administrator ***** and is not intended for the end user * * DR generated in /PRMD=CCETT/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/ * at Fri, 29 Dec 1995 03:58:14 +0100 * * Converted to RFC 822 at xr3.atlas.fr * at Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:11:00 +0100 * * Delivery Report Contents: * * Subject-Submission-Identifier: [/PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/;<4bslvj$etu@news.enter.net>] * Content-Identifier: kerberos/bind? * Content-Type: p2 * Subject-Intermediate-Trace-Information: /PRMD=CCETT/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/arrival Thu, 28 Dec 1995 01:02:15 +0100 action Relayed * Subject-Intermediate-Trace-Information: /ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/arrival Thu, 28 Dec 1995 01:11:03 +0100 action Relayed * Subject-Intermediate-Trace-Information: /PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/arrival Thu, 28 Dec 1995 01:10:54 +0100 action Relayed * Subject-Intermediate-Trace-Information: /ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/arrival Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:07:25 +0100 action Relayed * Recipient-Info: Jose.Kahan@ccett.fr, * /G=Jose/S=Kahan/PRMD=CCETT/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; * FAILURE reason Transfer-Failure (0); * diagnostic MTA-Congestion (2); * last trace () Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:07:25 +0100; ****** End of administration information -----Multi-Part-Message-Level-1-1-24292 Content-type: message/rfc822 X400-Received: by /PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:08:05 +0100 X400-Received: by mta xr3.atlas.fr in /PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:08:05 +0100 Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 04:08:05 +0100 X400-Originator: owner-kerberos@MIT.EDU X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:; X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/;<4bslvj$etu@news.enter.net>] X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2) Content-Identifier: kerberos/bind? From: " (Douglas Lieberman)" Sender: usenet@cam.ov.com Message-ID: <4bslvj$etu@news.enter.net> To: kerberos@MIT.EDU Subject: kerberos/bind? Original-Received: from GATEWAY by pad-thai.cam.ov.com with netnews for kerberos-wrapper@cam.ov.com (kerberos@mit.edu) PP-warning: Illegal Received field on preceding line Organization: IUP Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ok, here's my question....I have just inherited the job of sys-admin on a bunch of unix networks at IUP ( indiana university of PA ). One cluster is made up of DECstations running ultrix, the other of linux boxes ( and a few more independent machines ). The ultrix clustr is using some combination of BIND with hesiod classes and kerberos to distribute password, shadow, and quota files along with the other standard ones that bind distibutes. My problem is this, 1 I don't completely understand how this works ( which makes it difficult to maintain it ), and 2 I need to set up the same thing on the linux cluster. Ok, so why am I posting here? Well, I have found tons of stuff on DNS and BIND, and all of them say what I want to do is possible when bind is used in conjuction with kerberos , the problem is I can't find very much on krberos. Anyhow, if anyone could possibly point me in the direction of some literature which deals with this isuue ( or any in-dpeth coverage of krberos for that matter ) i would be greatly appreciative ..... thanks ******************************************************* Douglas Lieberman nlqheya@grove.iup.edu Sys Admin on: *.ma.iup.edu, tuna.co.iup.edu, goofy.co.iup.edu, wht2a102.resnet.iup.edu http://www.iup.edu/~nlqheya/index.html "Have you ever imagined the world with no hypothetical situations?" ******************************************************** -----Multi-Part-Message-Level-1-1-24292--