Received: from SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA10964; Sat, 30 Dec 95 14:15:18 EST Received: from liquor.cabi.net by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA06925; Sat, 30 Dec 95 14:15:08 EST Received: (from listadm@localhost) by liquor.cabi.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA11183; Sat, 30 Dec 1995 14:11:43 -0500 Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 14:11:43 -0500 From: Alligator Descartes Message-Id: <199512301859.SAA15796@fruitbat.mcqueen.com> Subject: Re: getting started To: bhogan@rahul.net Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 18:59:23 +0000 (GMT) Cc: descarte@hermetica.com, java-linux@java.blackdown.org In-Reply-To: from "Bill Hogan" at Dec 30, 95 10:57:00 am X-Pants: ** The return address of this email should be: descarte@hermetica.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 980 Resent-Message-Id: <"UJZZD3.0.8k2.AxOvm"@liquor> Resent-From: java-linux@java.blackdown.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/808 X-Loop: java-linux@java.blackdown.org Precedence: list Resent-Sender: java-linux-request@java.blackdown.org > AD> I had exactly the same problem until I upgraded my libc and ld.so to the > AD> following versions: > > AD> libc-5.2.16 > AD> ld-so-1.7.12 > > AD> and the problem went away. Works fine after that............... > > Hmm. > > Well, according to `ldd', both `javap' and `java' (i.e. `javac') > reference > > libc.so.5 => /G/java-linux/Debian.elf-libc/lib/libc.so.5.2.18.new > > and, like I said, `javap' works fine, so I don't see how libc can be > the problem. > > So do you think ld.so-1.7.0 (vs. 1.7.12) might be the problem? 1.7.10 didn't work. Flat. There's something in the HOWTO along those lines. I'd recommend upgrading to 1.7.12. > (Not clear to me how one gets the version of an extant `ld.so'.) ftp://ftp.ods.com should have it. ( I think that's the correct site! ) > Bill -- Alligator Descartes | "...Nil posse creari De nilo" descarte@hermetica.com | -- Lucretius, De Rerum Natura I, l.155 http://www.hermetica.com |