Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA17762; Mon, 22 Jan 96 00:41:03 EST
Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA24471; Mon, 22 Jan 96 00:40:59 EST
Received: from freefall.FreeBSD.ORG by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM)
	id AA23515; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 00:41:00 -0500
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA07240
          Sun, 21 Jan 1996 20:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA07114
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 20:40:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA07099
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 20:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id VAA21045; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 21:42:41 -0700
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 21:42:41 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199601220442.VAA21045@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Still no Java in Netscape?! 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960121190206.185A-100000@localhost>
References: <1900.822264582@time.cdrom.com>
	<Pine.BSF.3.91.960121190206.185A-100000@localhost>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> > They need threads.
> 
> Hmmm, well the version of Linux Netscape runs on (1.1.x and above, a.out) 
> doesn't have kernel threads, so I assume they're using user-mode 
> pthreads?

Yep.

> If so, I guess it would be a bit of work to get those running 
> with BSDI, though not impossible...

Yep.

> Well, I guess the best thing is to 
> show our support for a native (or at least BSDI-emulation) version with 
> Java support, and in the meantime use the Linux version...

Julian is in the process of importing the pthreads stuff into -current
even now, but this work isn't BSDi.  I doubt the NetScape folks are
going to go out of their way to add a pretty basic feature to BSDi just
to get Java applets going.  This should be something BSDi's technical
staff should be doing, but apparently aren't.


Nate
