Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po7.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA15765; Tue, 13 Feb 96 19:56:11 EST
Received: from liquor.cabi.net by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA02286; Tue, 13 Feb 96 19:55:34 EST
Received: by liquor.cabi.net (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA23842; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:54:04 -0500
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:54:04 -0500
X-Sender: chapman@saul1.u.washington.edu
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 16:52:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Randy Chapman <chapman@u.washington.edu>
To: Neil Archibald <neil@ohio.catapult.com>
Cc: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
Subject: Re: Performance issues
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960213103412.227C-100000@ohio>
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.3.91l.960213164954.32474E-100000@saul1.u.washington.edu>
Foo: foo-bar
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-Id: <"vIP1x1.0.Yp5.u9J8n"@liquor>
Resent-From: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
X-Mailing-List: <java-linux@java.blackdown.org> archive/latest/1132
X-Loop: java-linux@java.blackdown.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: java-linux-request@java.blackdown.org


If you have netscape already running, especially on a machine
with low ram, this isnt at all surprising if you are comparing
against the static-motif java.  Netscape is already in ram.

However, if you aren't doing AWT things, you ought to be using
the shared-motif java.  AWT wont work if you dont have Motif,
but everthing else should.  And it should run faster.

If you'ld try and let me know if it does, I'd be appreciavtive.

thanks,
--randy

On Tue, 13 Feb 1996, Neil Archibald wrote:

> 
> I'm sad to bring this up, but I've quit using the Linux java kit, (kind 
> of) on the basis that using the netscape hack way of compiling java 
> programs against the linux's try1 classes.zip IS ACTUALLY faster. Even 
> though I barely have enough RAM to run netscape, I get a average compile 
> time for 11 seconds under netscape compared to 28 seconds under javac. 
> So, now I have javac aliased to run netscape with the hack.
> 
> Oh, and using netscape to run java programs (ie 'java') is faster too.
> 
> But, keep up the good work, i'm sure there will be a time sometime soon 
> when I switch back again :)
> 
> Neil.
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> 
> mQBtAzCOpJEAAAEDAN3Bv1/AJavy2KW4YsZaMgE1n/LYBJ1mFJrUrnGnKVOjQo7C
> eLEmoc/LKNKuUbyeIGpbRZYjNXOKnwspKBz5RKVP4GC2zSYoqUUkfNFlSN5/8ouQ
> bF7ak7JVYhyNs/OpRQAFEbQiTmVpbCBBcmNoaWJhbGQgPG5laWxAY2F0YXB1bHQu
> Y29tPg==
> =YzLB
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> 
> 

