Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!americast.com!americast.com!usa-post
Newsgroups: usa-today.issues
From: usa-post@AmeriCast.Com
Organization: American Cybercasting
Approved: usa-post@AmeriCast.com
Subject: issues Tue, Jun 9 1992
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 92 05:19:54 EDT
Message-ID: <ns.issues.1992Jun9.051955@AmeriCast.com>

06-09 0000
DECISIONLINE: Issues & Debate
USA TODAY Update
June 9, 1992
Source: USA TODAY:Gannett National Information Network
    
   Here are some of the issues and topics being debated across the 
nation Tuesday morning in USA TODAY: Summit; Police.
    
TODAY'S DEBATE - BIODIVERSITY TREATY:
    
USA TODAY'S OPINION:
    
   President Bush may be all alone this week in refusing to sign 
an Earth Summit treaty aimed at protecting endangered wildlife 
species. He also happens to be right. The so-called biodiversity 
treaty is long on good intentions. ... But the price demanded of 
the USA is too high, and the promise of meaningful results is too 
low. ... If the USA is going to spend money on conservation, it 
should be able to assure that the money is spent effectively. ... 
Too much sacrifice; too few results. Bush should resist pressure 
from home and abroad to sign the treaty and work for changes.  
Other developed countries pressing Bush to sign have less at 
stake. In fact, some could gain by opening up U.S. biotech 
efforts. ... President Bush should take the lead in advancing 
programs to prevent species from dying out. He should be willing 
to spend U.S. money and expertise to help avert environmental 
devastation. But he should keep his name off this document until 
rightful U.S. concerns are addressed.
    
OTHER VIEW:
    
   MICHAEL J. BEAN, chairman of the wildlife program of the 
Environmental Defense Fund: Twenty years ago, the USA hosted the 
meeting that produced the Convention on International Trade in 
Endangered Species. We were first among 115 nations ratifying the 
treaty known here as CITES and elsewhere as "the Washington 
Convention" in recognition of its birthplace and America's 
leadership role in creating it. CITES was the first global effort 
to protect shrinking biological diversity. ... (But) recognition 
of the limitations of CITES prompted efforts at a broader 
agreement addressing the root causes of biodiversity loss. U.S. 
leadership of two decades ago, however, has vanished. Our 
government won't join the new biodiversity treaty. ... The retreat 
from world leadership in protecting biodiversity follows close on 
the heels of plans to weaken our own primary safety net for 
biodiversity, the Endangered Species Act. The USA should 
reconsider. Vanishing biodiversity is an urgent environmental 
problem because it is irreversible. Species lost today cannot be 
re-created tomorrow. With them disappear treasures of potential 
medicines, chemicals and knowledge to enrich human life in the 
future. On such vital matters, the USA should not be a nit-picking 
naysayer but a leader.
    
VOICES ACROSS THE NATION ON POLICE CHIEFS' RESPONSIBILITY:
    
   CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Peter Hahn, 20, student: Yes. There should be 
departmental and public committees recommending to the mayor who 
should be police chief. It is clear a lot of people don't trust 
the way big-city politics work, but you definitely have to start 
opening it up more.
    
   BELLINGHAM, Wash., Chris Stearns, 37, cafe owner: Elected 
officials shouldn't appoint police chiefs. The regular hiring 
process of a city or municipality should apply. It would ensure 
that more than just political issues were addressed in the hiring 
process and that real job qualifications were considered.
    
   LITTLE ROCK, Ark., Tracy Steele, 28, governor's assistant: The 
reforms in Los Angeles will help bridge the gap between the people 
and the police. I think this country needs to take a serious look 
at police brutality, and a bipartisan committee of grass-roots 
people should be responsible for looking into cases of it.
    
   NEW YORK, N.Y., Sandy Rochelle, 44, actress, poet, producer: 
The mayor must override the police department. There must be 
someone it is accountable to. Most police are doing their job. But 
there is the guy who is in it because it gives him power, because 
he wants to carry a gun and feel important. 
    
   LAWRENCE, Kan., Henry Collins, 50, security guard: I've been a 
chief of police in tribal enforcement in Oklahoma. The police are 
public servants; they serve the general public and should be 
responsible to it. The police chief should also be responsible for 
his men. We are mortals, subject to corruption and mistakes.
    
Issues & Debate Editor: Beth Mann. (1-919-855-3491) Making copies 
of USA TODAY Update (Copyright, 1992) for further distribution 
violates federal law.
    

This article is copyright 1992 Gannett News Service.  Redistribution to
other sites is not permitted except by arrangement with American 
Cybercasting Corporation.  For more information, send-email to 
usa@AmeriCast.COM
