18.440 Probability & Random Variables
Fall 2009
Instructor: Scott Roger Sheffield
TA: Zhenqi He
Lecture: MWF11 (4-370)
Announcements
office hours and final
I will hold office hours tomorrow in 2-180 from 11 until 1.The practice final is online.
All problems on the final will be similar to problems on either the problem sets or the practice or actual exams on the course web page.
The best way to study is to make sure you can do all those problems (along with any possible variants you can easily conceive of).
You should know the proofs in the book for the central limits theorem and the weak/strong laws of large numbers. Otherwise, you don't need to memorize proofs from the book.
If you are able to solve the practice exam problems, then your knowledge of Black-Scholes/risk neutral probability is very probably sufficient.
Ditto for martingales (provided you can also solve the problem set problems).
Announced on 10 December 2009 9:19 a.m. by Scott Roger Sheffield
This week's office hours and Make-up Exam
By the way, there will be no office hours this Thursday 4-6pm.
Regards,
Zhenqi
Announced on 16 November 2009 8:30 p.m. by Zhenqi He
Midterm grades
Here is the grade breakdown for this exam:
55-100 A grades
25-54 B grades
15-24 C grades
If your score was below 15 and you wish to continue in the course, you should come and speak with me.
Announced on 16 November 2009 7:40 p.m. by Scott Roger Sheffield
Midterm plus solutions on webpage
The midterm and the solutions are posted on the webpage. We hope to have grades on Stellar later tonight. I will bring the exams to class on Wednesday.Announced on 16 November 2009 6:54 p.m. by Scott Roger Sheffield
Cory's solutions
Dear Prof. Sheffield,Here are my rough answers to the practice midterm. I'd encourage anyone looking at these to use Bayes's Theorem when interpreting their results [e.g. I was 99% sure of my answer, but...]
1. a) Like we did in class, it's binomial Choose(2,i)/2^5 =
Choose(2,i)/32.
b) Probability of being at Y = y given that X = 2Y is P(Y = y &
X = 2Y)/P(X = 2Y). Then sum that times y^2 for all possible y.
I got:
Sum[y^2 / (y! * (2y)!), y, 0, Infinity] / Sum[1/(i! *
(2i)!],i,0,Infinity]
Had to cancel out some e^(-1)'s.
c) P(X = 2Y + i | X - 2Y > 0). Must have i > 0. Then it
becomes P(X = 2*Y + i & X - 2Y > 0)/P(X - 2Y > 0) = P(X =
2*Y + i)/P(X - 2*Y > 0).
I got:
Sum[ 1/( k! * (2k + i)!),k,0,Infinity] / Sum[Sum[ 1/( k! * (2k +
j)!),k,0,Infinity],j,1,Infinity]
Denominator is just like summing the numerator from 1 to
infinity.
d) Sum P(X = i, Y = i) for i is 0 to infinity.
I got:
Sum[Exp[-2]/(i!)^2,i,0,Infinity]
2 a) I couldn't simplify this from the integral very much, at
least not without using the cumulative distribution for a normal
variable.
If the pdf for the exponential is f and the one for the normal
distribution is g, then we want
Integral[f(a - x)*g(x),x,-Infinity,a]. From -Infinity to a since
the exponential only goes from 0 to infinity (no negatives).
I got:
lambda/(Sqrt[2*Pi]*sigma) * Integral[Exp[-lambda*(a - x)]*Exp[ -(x
- mu)^2 / (2*sigma^2) ] , x, 0, Infinity]
or you could note that this means we shift the normal over by
sigma^2*lambda and play with that to get it in terms of the normal
CDF.
b) E[Exp[i*t*X]] = Integral[1/5 * Exp[-i*t*X],x,0,5]
I got:
(1 - Exp[-5*i*t])/(5it)
Similarly, for the moment:
(1 - Exp[-5*t])/(5t)
c) Just as before, this as a sum of (n - 1) steps, S_i. S_1 is the
time until the smallest exponential, S_2 the time between smallest
and 2nd smallest... All S_i are independent. Each one is
exponential with parameter (n - i + 1)*lambda.
For expectation, I got:
1/lambda * (1/n + 1/(n - 1) + ... + 1/2).
For variance, we can still add 'em up since they're
independent. Variance for an exponential is 1/lambda^2 So I
got:
1/lambda^2 (1/n^2 + 1/(n - 1)^2 + ... + 1/4)
3. a) To get f_X, take Integral[1,x,-Sqrt[1-x^2],Sqrt[1-x^2]] =
2Sqrt[1-x^2]. Similarly, f_Y = 2*Sqrt[1-y^2]/
b) X^2 + Y^2 is between 0 and 1. For those quantities, P(X^2 + Y^2
< a) = [area of a circle of radius a] / [area of a circle of
radius 1] = a^2. Take the derivative with respect to a.
I got:
2*a [0 <= a <= 1].
Then, for the max, I also tried to calculate P(X < a,Y < a)
and take the derivative. -1 <= a <= 1. You just take an
integral, but you have to figure out the bounds. Say we integrate
with respect to x first [x is on the outer integral]. Then x can be
from -1 to a. Then, y must be larger than -1 and larger than
-Sqrt[1 - x^2]. -Sqrt[1 - x^2] is always bigger. y must be <= 1,
<= Sqrt[1 - x^2], and <= a. a <= 1, so ignore the one bit.
Overall, it's <= min(Sqrt[1 - x^2],a).
So, we're integrating min[Sqrt[1-x^2],a] + Sqrt[1-x^2] with
respect to x from -1 to a. We want to take the derivative with
respect to a, so it will just be this function evaluated at a.
I got:
min[Sqrt[1 - a^2],a] + Sqrt[1-a^2] (-1 <= a <= 1). There is a
kink at a = sqrt(2)/2
c) Want: f(x,y) / f_Y
I got:
1/(2*Sqrt[1-y^2]) [-Sqrt[1 - y^2] <= x <= Sqrt[1 - y^2])
d) Want integral[a*f_a] = integral[a*(2a),a,0,1]
I got:
2/3
4 a) We did this one in class. Each X_i has expected value 5/4 and
all independent.
I got:
(5/4)^n
b) Need >= 55 heads (work out just by using logs:
2^(m)*(1/2)^(100 - m) > 1000). Using central limit approximation
it's ~1 stdev above mean.
I got:
~16%
5. a) Integral[1*Exp[-(a - x]*2*Exp[-2*x],{x,0,a}]
I got:
2*(Exp[a] - 1)/Exp[2*a]
b) Also done in class (mostly). Get Cov(XY,X) + Cov(XY,Y). Use
independence of X & Y and formula for covariance to get:
E[X^2]E[Y] - E[X]^2E[Y] + E[Y^2]E[X] - E[Y]^2E[X]
I got:
3/4
c) Call F(a) the cumulative density function. F(a) = P(X <
a)*P(Y < a)*P(Z < a) = (1 - Exp[-a])*(1 - Exp[-2*a])*(1 -
Exp[-3*a]). f(a) = F'(a) is the density function.
Integrate[a*f(a),a,0,Infinity]. Use integration by parts if you
want to do it by hand and note that the stuff that goes to infinity
cancels (in the limit).
I got:
1 + 1/2 - 1/4 - 1/5 + 1/6 = 73/60
d) We did this in class. It's just exponential with parameter 1
+ 2 + 3 = 6.
I got:
1/36
e) We first wanna compute Cov(min,max). Call max = min + I, where I
is some interval. If, e.g., X is the minimum, I will be the max of
two exponentials of parameters 2 and 3 (because exponentials are
memoryless). Because of the memorylessness of exponential
variables, I and min are independent. (Note: I actually didn't
believe this until I computed the covariance out exactly. I'm
not sure I understand... if the minimum is larger, shouldn't I
tend to be smaller because of which variables have been canceled
out?).
Then cov(min,max) = var(min) = 1/36. p = 1/36 /
Sqrt[(1/36*var(max))]. You can compute var(max) just like we did
earlier with integration by parts.
I got:
E[max^2] = 2*(1 + 1/4 - 1/16 - 1/25 + 1/36) = 4231/1800. Var[max] =
4231/1800 - (73/60)^2 = 3133/3600.
(1/36) / Sqrt[3133 / 3600 * 1/36] = 10 / Sqrt[3133] ~0.179
6 a) For a) and b) we're given too much information.
Call M_i a variable that is 1 if X_i is a local max and 0
otherwise. We want E[sum[M_i]] = Sum[E[M_i]]. Now, at each i to be
a local max just means to be the largest of three variables with
the same distribution. This happens 1/3 of the time. So, E[M_i] =
1/3
I got:
8/3
b) To compute E[N^2], I just expanded using the above formula. Get
Sum[E[(M_i)^2] + 2*E[M_i * M_j]]. If i and j differ by one, then
M_i * M_j = 0 since they can't both be local maxes. If M_i and
M_j differ by 2, we count the number of permutations/orderings of
(1,2,3,4,5) where 2 comes before 1 and 3 and 4 comes before 3 and
5. I count 6 + 6 + 2 + 2 = 16. So, E[M_i*M_j] = 16/120 = 2/15.
Otherwise, M_i and M_j are independent since they don't share
any comparisons. 8 choose 2 = 28 total pairs.
I got:
E[N^2] = 8/3 + 2*(7*0 + 6*2/15 + (28 - 13)*1/9) = 38/5
Var[N] = 38/5 - (8/3)^2 = 22/45
c) N = Sum[M_i]. Note that X_1 is independent from all M_i except
M_2. So, cov(N,X_1) = cov(M_1,X_1). We want to compute the
expectation of X1 in the case where X2 = max(X1,X2,X3). For this to
happen:
X3 < X2, X1 < X2. To do this, I took integrals. Note that
changing the mean doesn't change anything about N and thus
nothing about cov(N,X1) (cov(X + a,Y) = cov(X,Y) if a is a
constant). So, assume the mean is 0. So, all we want is E[X1*M1]
(E[X1]*E[M1] = 0).
Pick some value for X2, call it m. We want to integrate over m.
Integrate[f_X2(m)*P(X3 < m) *
Integrate[f_X1(y)*y,y,-Infinity,m],m,-Infinity,Infinity], i.e. just
integrate m over all possible values. Using a substitution for z =
y^2 [or something similar], the inner integral turns into a normal
distribution. Multiply the two normal distributions together, pull
out constants, and use the change of variables z = Sqrt(2)*m. Pull
out more constants and use the reverse of the chain rule to
integrate.
I got:
cov(X1,M_1) = -sigma/(4*Sqrt[Pi])
Var(X1) = sigma^2. Var(N) = 22/45. cov(X1,N) = cov(X1,M1).
Overall:
-sigma/(4*Sqrt(Pi))
--------
Sqrt[sigma^2 * 22/45] = -3/4*Sqrt[5/(22*Pi)] `-0.202
7. We've mostly heard these before so I'll just repeat
them.
a) Normal(n*mu,n*sigma^2)
b) Gamma(n,lambda)
c) Negative binomial distribution (n,p) [honestly, I found this
through googling. I don't really remember us really studying
the negative one]
d) Poisson (n*lambda)
e) Binomial(n,p)
Anyway, I hope these are correct enough to be helpful. I found the
correlation coefficient problems pretty challenging... I could not
have gotten very many points on this exam in an hour. :-/
Sincerely,
Cory Smith
Announced on 15 November 2009 8:33 a.m. by Scott Roger Sheffield