Return-Path: Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu by po11.mit.edu (8.9.2/4.7) id OAA22087; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:23:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from TIGERSHARK.neaq.org (mail.neaq.org [12.105.75.18]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA04800 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:23:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from brinnj.neaq.org ([10.10.2.99]) by TIGERSHARK.neaq.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:19:51 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.32.20011202141006.00716abc@mail.neaq.org> X-Sender: jbrowning@mail.neaq.org X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 14:10:06 -0500 To: in-house-pikans@mit.edu From: Jamie Browning Subject: No response... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2001 19:19:51.0638 (UTC) FILETIME=[50D93F60:01C17B66] Hi all So, from the resounding lack of response, I'm assuming there are no massive problems. So how about I tentatively ask for this to be put on tonights house meeting agenda. If people decide there that they need to think about it for a week, and ask me questions, then that's cool, but if there's really no one who thinks this is a bad idea, y'all could vote on it tonight, and we could get rolling. The more time we have, the better we can screen people, right? I proxy a big fat resounding YES. If you do vote to do it tonight, you should also talk about how you want me to initially screen them, and then what you want to do after that... You should also decide on a number. I suggest the number one, but my approval vote also goes for two. Let's get proactive! Cheers Jamie