Return-Path: Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu by po11.mit.edu (8.9.2/4.7) id OAA00677; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:45:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (MANAWATU-MAIL-CENTRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.71]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA17070; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:44:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from department-of-alchemy.mit.edu (DEPARTMENT-OF-ALCHEMY.MIT.EDU [18.7.16.69]) by manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA05549; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:44:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (lphelan@localhost) by department-of-alchemy.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06381; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:44:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:44:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Luke Phelan To: Steve Summit cc: Subject: Re: AILG alcohol sub-committee proposal In-Reply-To: <2002Aug19.1322.scs.0004@eskimo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII given that under the current system this is totally unenforceable, what kind(s) of authority(ies) is/are going to be created to enforce it? i expect (hope) that this is a rhetorical question at this point, but i'm curious how long it will be before... a.the r.a. becomes the lawman. in fact, it's probably worth asking, if this policy goes through does the r.a. become de facto responsible for the liquor in the house ands the use there of? b.powers are extended to the c.p.s to police this in some fashion. c.chuck vest starts going door to door. d.frats are encouraged to turn each other in/students are encouraged to turn each other in exactly how much power does the body deliberating this have, and what are our options for refusing to acknowledge the authority of that body and/or withdrawing from it? --luke if you think you see with just your eyes you're mad