\documentstyle[doublespace,fullpage]{article}
\begin{document}
Subquestions for 24.01 paper \#9

Main question: What is Thomson's argument against the ``extreme
view''?  Is this argument convincing?

Subquestions:
\begin{itemize}

\item Thomson's argument against the extreme position

\begin{itemize}

\item What is the extreme position?

\item What arguments does Thomson give for the extreme position as
example arguments to refute?

\item In what way does Thomson say the extreme position can be
weakened so as to require a different refutation?

\item What analogy does Thomson use to refute the strong extreme
position?

\item What analogy does she use to refute the weak extreme position?

\item What is Thomson trying to show with these analogies?

\end{itemize}

\item Whether this argument is convincing

\begin{itemize}

\item Does Thomson's first analogy have the morally relevant
characteristics to refute the strong extreme position?  Are there any
relevant characteristics of it that don't exist in the abortion
scenario?

\item Does Thomson's second analogy have the morally relevant
characteristics necssary to refute the weak extreme position?  What
characteristic of it is not present in the abortion scenario, which
possibly undermines it?

\end{itemize}

\end{itemize}

\end{document}

