6.241/16.338 Dynamic Systems and Control
Spring 2012
Instructors: Jonathan P How, Sertac Karaman, Alexandre Megretski
Lecture: MW11-12.30 (32-144)
Announcements
Reviewing your 6.241 final exam papers: a correction
Sorry, I forgot that the coming Monday is actually a
holiday.
Hence, the paper viewing will be available starting on Tuesday, not Monday.
Hence, the paper viewing will be available starting on Tuesday, not Monday.
Announced on 25 May 2012 3:10 p.m. by Alexandre Megretski
Reviewing your 6.241 final exam papers
The graded final papers will be made available (starting
Monday)
through my administrative assistant, Lisa Gaumond (Email lisaga@mit.edu).
The papers must remain with Lisa, but you will be able to review them, and, if necessary,
schedule an appointment with me for a further discussion.
through my administrative assistant, Lisa Gaumond (Email lisaga@mit.edu).
The papers must remain with Lisa, but you will be able to review them, and, if necessary,
schedule an appointment with me for a further discussion.
Announced on 24 May 2012 6:50 p.m. by Alexandre Megretski
6.241 conclusion
The final exam is now graded (mean 69, standard deviation 17),
and (hand-written) solutions are posted on Stellar.
Final 6.241 grades are now submitted electronically.
Thank you for your hard work in 6.241 this term.
Best wishes for the future!
Alex
Final 6.241 grades are now submitted electronically.
Thank you for your hard work in 6.241 this term.
Best wishes for the future!
Alex
Announced on 24 May 2012 6:23 p.m. by Alexandre Megretski
FR7 corrections
The answer to FR7 had several typos/sign errors: essentially,
every "-g" term should be replaced by
"g",
and the "a+a" in an observer gain denominator is actually "1+a".
Referring to yesterday's office hours discussion, the hint/solution posted refers to modeling the situation as
x'=Ax+Bg, f=Cx+Dg, q=cx+dg.
It looks like the alternative of modeling the setup with
x'=Ax+Bf, g=Cx+Df, q=cx+df
(the coefficient matrices A,B,C,D,c,d will be different, of course) also works.
and the "a+a" in an observer gain denominator is actually "1+a".
Referring to yesterday's office hours discussion, the hint/solution posted refers to modeling the situation as
x'=Ax+Bg, f=Cx+Dg, q=cx+dg.
It looks like the alternative of modeling the setup with
x'=Ax+Bf, g=Cx+Df, q=cx+df
(the coefficient matrices A,B,C,D,c,d will be different, of course) also works.
Announced on 23 May 2012 11:38 a.m. by Alexandre Megretski
office hour: 3.30-4.30pm today
I will be available 3.30-4.30pm today (originally, in my
office) to answer questions.
Announced on 23 May 2012 11:15 a.m. by Alexandre Megretski