rlm {MASS} | R Documentation |
Fit a linear model by robust regression using an M estimator.
rlm(x, ...) ## S3 method for class 'formula': rlm(formula, data, weights, ..., subset, na.action, method = c("M", "MM", "model.frame"), wt.method = c("case", "inv.var"), model = TRUE, x.ret = TRUE, y.ret = FALSE, contrasts = NULL) ## Default S3 method: rlm(x, y, weights, ..., w = rep(1, nrow(x)), init, psi = psi.huber, scale.est, k2 = 1.345, method = c("M", "MM"), wt.method = c("inv.var", "case"), maxit = 20, acc = 1e-4, test.vec = "resid")
formula |
a formula of the form y ~ x1 + x2 + ... .
|
data |
data frame from which variables specified in formula are
preferentially to be taken.
|
weights |
prior weights for each case. |
subset |
An index vector specifying the cases to be used in fitting. |
na.action |
A function to specify the action to be taken if NA s are found. The
default action is for the procedure to fail. An alternative is
na.omit , which leads to omission of cases with missing values on any
required variable.
|
x |
a matrix or data frame containing the explanatory variables. |
y |
the response: a vector of length the number of rows of x .
|
method |
currently either M-estimation or find the model frame. MM estimation is M-estimation with Tukey's biweight initialized by a specific S-estimator. See the details section. |
wt.method |
are the weights case weights (giving the relative importance of case, so a weight of 2 means there are two of these) or the inverse of the variances, so a weight of two means this error is twice as variable? |
model |
should the model frame be returned in the object? |
x.ret |
should the model matrix be returned in the object? |
y.ret |
should the response be returned in the object? |
contrasts |
optional contrast specifications: se lm .
|
w |
(optional) initial down-weighting for each case. |
init |
(optional) initial values for the coefficients OR a method to find
initial values OR the result of a fit with a coef component. Known
methods are "ls" (the default) for an initial least-squares fit
using weights w*weights , and "lqs" for an unweighted least-trimmed
squares fit with 200 samples.
|
psi |
the psi function is specified by this argument. It must give
(possibly by name) a function g(x, ..., deriv) that for deriv=0
returns psi(x)/x and for deriv=1 returns psi'(x). Tuning constants
will be passed in via ... .
|
scale.est |
method of scale estimation: re-scaled MAD of the residuals or Huber's proposal 2. |
k2 |
tuning constant used for Huber proposal 2 scale estimation. |
maxit |
the limit on the number of IWLS iterations. |
acc |
the accuracy for the stopping criterion. |
test.vec |
the stopping criterion is based on changes in this vector. |
... |
additional arguments to be passed to rlm.default or to the psi
function.
|
Fitting is done by iterated re-weighted least squares (IWLS).
Psi functions are supplied for the Huber, Hampel and Tukey bisquare
proposals as psi.huber
, psi.hampel
and
psi.bisquare
. Huber's corresponds to a convex optimization
problem and gives a unique solution (up to collinearity). The other
two will have multiple local minima, and a good starting point is
desirable.
Selecting method = "MM"
selects a specific set of options which
ensures that the estimator has a high breakdown point. The initial set
of coefficients and the final scale are selected by an S-estimator
with k0 = 1.548
; this gives (for n >> p) breakdown point 0.5.
The final estimator is an M-estimator with Tukey's biweight and fixed
scale that will inherit this breakdown point provided c > k0
;
this is true for the default value of c
that corresponds to
95% relative efficiency at the normal.
An object of class "rlm"
inheriting from "lm"
.
The additional components not in an lm
object are
s |
the robust scale estimate used |
w |
the weights used in the IWLS process |
psi |
the psi function with parameters substituted |
conv |
the convergence criteria at each iteration |
converged |
did the IWLS converge? |
P. J. Huber (1981) Robust Statistics. Wiley.
F. R. Hampel, E. M. Ronchetti, P. J. Rousseeuw and W. A. Stahel (1986) Robust Statistics: The Approach based on Influence Functions. Wiley.
A. Marazzi (1993) Algorithms, Routines and S Functions for Robust Statistics. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole.
Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth edition. Springer.
data(stackloss) summary(rlm(stack.loss ~ ., stackloss)) rlm(stack.loss ~ ., stackloss, psi = psi.hampel, init = "lts") rlm(stack.loss ~ ., stackloss, psi = psi.bisquare)