<?xml version="1.0" ?><entry xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:planet="http://planet.intertwingly.net/"><id>https://blog.nelhage.com/2015/11/what-mongodb-got-right/</id><link href="https://blog.nelhage.com/2015/11/what-mongodb-got-right/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/><title>What MongoDB got Right</title><summary>MongoDB is perhaps the most-widely-mocked piece of software out there right now.
While some of the mockery is out-of-date or rooted in misunderstandings, much of it is well-deserved, and it’s difficult to disagree that much of MongoDB’s engineering is incredibly simplistic, inefficient, and immature compared to more-established databases like PostgreSQL or MySQL.
You can argue, and I would largely agree, that this is actually part of MongoDB’s brilliant marketing strategy, of sacrificing engineering quality in order to get to market faster and build a hype machine, with the idea that the engineering will follow later.</summary><updated planet:format="November 01, 2015 10:00 AM">2015-11-01T10:00:00Z</updated><source><id>https://blog.nelhage.com/post/</id><author><name>Nelson Elhage</name></author><link href="https://blog.nelhage.com/post/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/><link href="https://blog.nelhage.com/post/atom.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><subtitle>Recent content in Posts on Made of Bugs</subtitle><title>Posts on Made of Bugs</title><updated planet:format="September 17, 2026 02:37 PM">2026-09-17T14:37:03Z</updated><planet:format>rss20</planet:format><planet:bozo>false</planet:bozo><planet:items_per_page>60</planet:items_per_page><planet:name>Nelson Elhage</planet:name><planet:css-id>nelson-elhage</planet:css-id><planet:days_per_page>0</planet:days_per_page><planet:http_etag>&quot;5b2ae9eec2e293572f6ae5a000bd0161-ssl-df&quot;</planet:http_etag><planet:http_status>200</planet:http_status><planet:encoding>utf-8</planet:encoding></source></entry>