project.xfree86 was created in response to the attached message.  If
you'd like access, please read over doc/LICENSE and send mail to jhawk
stating you agree to abide by them.

	John Hawkinson
	jhawk@mit.edu					17 August 1996

[2438]  daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Hawkinson) SIPB-AFS-requests 08/17/96 18:27 (53 lines)
Subject: project.xfree86?
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 17:58:54 -0400
To: sipb-afsreq@MIT.EDU
Cc: netbsd-dev@MIT.EDU, linux-dev@MIT.EDU
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>


As the XFree86 3.1.3 development cycle is drawing to a close in the
next few weeks, I think it would be beneficial to test the current
beta on some office machines and perhaps other machines around MIT.
In particular, it would be valuable to test XF86Setup.

To hold source and builds, I'd like to request the following
volumes:

	Volume				Quota		Please mount on

	project.xfree86			100megs		project/xfree86
	xfree86.netbsd.nb		100megs		project/xfree86/tmp/n
	xfree86.linux.nb		100megs		project/xfree86/tmp/l

(The source tree is 35.8 megs compressed)

Please note that while the XFree86 Consortium is somewhat fascist with
beta code, they're not entirely so. In particular, the following is
part of the beta agreement:

	                 This material is for your use solely, or the use
       of any individuals directly responsible to you (any such individuals
       are subject to the above listed terms).
 
As such, please acl the mounted volumes to jhawk:xfree86-acl:

[lola-granola!jhawk] ~> pts mem jhawk:xfree86-acl -c sipb
Members of jhawk:xfree86-acl (id: -99057) are:
  nygren
  jhawk

I think a reasonable interpretation is for me too add anyone
reasonable who asks to the acl (assuming they agree to the terms of
the agreement, which are pretty mild but I won't include them here;
probably I'll reference them in the locker's toplevel README).

I'm not sure what the right thing to do with this locker is when the
beta cycle completes. Probably we'll end up clearing out the build
volumes (and of course, there's the next build cycle)...

Thanks.

--jhawk
  ps: it might not be unreasonable to do builds for platforms other than
  the i386. In particular, it might be useful/sensical to replace some of
  the X11R6.1 stuff in outland with XFree86. More thought than I want to
  devote right now, that is...
--[2438]--