\documentstyle[doublespace]{article}
\author{David Golombek}
\title{Reaction to \underline{The Man in the High Castle}}
\date{\today}
\begin{document}
\maketitle


{\large \underline{The Man in the High Castle}}

I went into \underline{The Man in the High Castle} expecting it to be
yet another alternative universe story, which, although frequently
full of interesting speculation, rarely have interesting characters or
strong plots.  \underline{The Man in the High Castle} (TMHC) had both
of the latter in great quantities, while being only average in quality
on the former.  I found the speculations into a World War 2 won
by the Germans and Japanese to be only mediocre, being clouded by the
fact that I've read two other books with similar scenarios.  I greatly
enjoyed the insights of Robert Childan into Japanese society, and
Mr. Tagomi's views on politics, both of which held great truth even in
our own timeline.

Of course, this relevance to our own timeline is what alternate
histories are all about, and in this respect, TMHC 


\newpage
{\large Comments on Jered Floyd's story}


\newpage
{\large Comments on }

\end{document}
