Received: by ATHENA-PO-1.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA15570; Fri, 26 Oct 90 09:01:53 EDT Received: from EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU by ATHENA.MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA26895; Fri, 26 Oct 90 09:01:45 EDT Received: from expire.lcs.mit.edu by expo.lcs.mit.edu; Fri, 26 Oct 90 08:57:40 EDT Received: by expire.lcs.mit.edu; Fri, 26 Oct 90 08:57:38 EDT Message-Id: <9010261257.AA01060@expire.lcs.mit.edu> To: advisory@expo.lcs.mit.edu Cc: vex@expo.lcs.mit.edu Subject: VEX trial review closes November 1 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 90 08:57:37 -0400 From: rws@expo.lcs.mit.edu (Bob Scheifler) A reminder that VEX trial review closes November 1 (Thursday). I would appreciate it if Advisory reps would send me their votes by then as to whether technical review should begin. Comments from individuals on the vex mailing list are also appreciated. Remember that a Yes vote does not imply acceptance of the current specification, only that it should be formally reviewed for acceptance. Here are some possible votes (pick one or supply your own): We believe VEX should proceed to Technical Review, and we expect to participate in the review. We do not have the resources at the present time to participate in the VEX review, but we are willing to let the Technical Review proceed without us. We are not interested in VEX, but we agree to let Technical Review proceed. We do not have the resources at the present time to participate in the VEX review, and ask that Technical Review be postponed until , when we would have the resources available. We believe VEX should not proceed to Technical Review, because .