Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po9.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA10977; Wed, 28 Aug 96 02:55:22 EDT
Received: from CUTTER-JOHN.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA21360; Wed, 28 Aug 96 02:55:18 EDT
From: emhavens@MIT.EDU
Received: by cutter-john.mit.edu (8.6.12/4.7) id CAA03228; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 02:55:17 -0400
Message-Id: <199608280655.CAA03228@cutter-john.mit.edu>
To: "Wolfram v.Kiparski" <wolf@netheaven.com>
Reply-To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: rec.models.rockets FAQ Part **
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 03 Aug 1996 21:44:05 EDT."
             <v03007800ae29720dc016@[198.69.29.18]> 
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 02:55:17 EDT

We have received parts 00-14 of the rec.models.rockets FAQ and we are
approving them all.  I just have one question about number 2.  Parts
00-03 seem to have been resubmitted, and they are fine.  However,
previously part 2, addresses, had two sub parts, but now it does not.
It this the way
you want it to be?  I am changing our database to reflect this change,
but let us know if you want to keep it as one part.  In any case,
here are the headers you sent, so you know exactly what I approved.  The
lines that are the same in each part have only been mentioned once, where
the lines that are different are stated for each part.  Remember that
you only want to put in the relevant Subject, Archive-name, and
Rec-model-rockets-archive-name line in each section.

Reference:

[inclusion deleted by /tmp/folder-shrink.pl]

Emily Havens
one of the *.answers moderators
news-answers-request@mit.edu
