From usenet@zeta.org.au	 Sun Sep  1 10:10:26 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id KAA21212; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 10:10:20 -0400
Received: from relay2.UU.NET by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA14610; Sun, 1 Sep 96 10:07:18 EDT
Received: from phaedrus.kralizec.net.au by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: phaedrus.kralizec.net.au [203.15.68.24])
	id QQbfhg05557; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 10:06:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from usenet@localhost) by phaedrus.kralizec.net.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id AAA27151; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 00:09:32 +1000
To: news-answers@uunet.uu.net
Path: dialup02.syd1.zeta.org.au!user
From: jeffcox@zeta.org.au (Jeffrey Cox)
Newsgroups: talk.origins,news.answers
Subject: talk.origins FAQ (Creation) 2 of 3
Followup-To: talk.origins
Date: 1 Sep 1996 14:09:32 GMT
Organization: Zeta
Lines: 401
Distribution: world
Message-Id: <jeffcox-0209960001120001@dialup02.syd1.zeta.org.au>
References: talk.origins FAQ (Creation) 1 of 3
Reply-To: jeffcox@zeta.org.au
Nntp-Posting-Host: dialup02.syd1.zeta.org.au
Summary: This posting contains a list of Frequently Asked Questions about 
 the creation / evolution debate answered from a Christian point of view, 
 including an outline of the Christian views, discussion of perceived flaws 
 in abiogenesis and evolution and a detailed explanation of the old earth 
 creation viewpoint.
Keywords: creation, evolution, abiogenesis
Archive-Name: talk.origins_faq_creation/part2
Posting-Frequency: monthly
Last-Modified: September 1 1996
Version: 1.6
Url: http://www.zeta.org.au/~jeffcox/creation.html

[14] Where does evolution stand in the absence of abiogenesis?
[A] Without abiogenesis evolution is a story without a beginning, such a
story is incomplete. Evolution does not explain the origin of species.

Since there is no plausible explanation for the origin of the first living
organism by purely natural processes it is reasonable to assume that the
first living organism was created by God, and therefore reasonable to
consider that the process of creation continued beyond the appearance of
the first species.

[15] Does the recent announcement that material that is believed to be the
fossil remains of bacteria was found in a meteorite that is thought to
have originally come from Mars mean that abiogenesis and evolution are now
more plausible?
[A] There is considerable disagreement within the scientific community
about the origin of the Carbon compounds in the meteorite. A number of
scientists think that the material in the meteorite was produced by
inorganic processes and is not the remains of living organisms.
[remainder of text deleted by folder-shrink.pl]
