Replied: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 17:15:58 EDT Replied: "pking@idirect.com " From pking@mail.idirect.com Fri Sep 20 00:11:45 1996 Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id AAA15048; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:11:44 -0400 Received: from nemesis.idirect.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA23094; Fri, 20 Sep 96 00:11:24 EDT Received: from hailnet7.idirect.com (pking@fate.idirect.com [207.136.82.51]) by nemesis.idirect.com (8.6.9/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA02981 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:04:41 -0400 Message-Id: <199609200404.AAA02981@nemesis.idirect.com> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Paul King" Organization: Internet Direct To: news-answers@MIT.EDU Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 22:47:24 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Subject: [alt.flame.psychiatry] FAQ: Welcome - Read this First! Reply-To: pking@idirect.com Priority: normal X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.42a) From: pking@idirect.com (Paul E. J. King) Newsgroups: alt.flame.psychiatry,alt.answers,news.answers Subject: [alt.flame.psychiatry] FAQ: Welcome - Read this First! Approved: news-answers-request@mit.edu Followup-To: alt.flame.psychiatry Summary: A newsgroup whose sole enterprise is flaming psychiatrists Archive-Name: alt/flame/psychiatry.faq Posting-Frequency: biweekly Last-modified: 1996/09/19 The alt.flame.psychiatry Frequently-Asked Questions File DRAFT VERSION 2 Thanks for the suggestions and changes so far. I have added a list of recommended readings in Question 15. Feel free to suggest more. Welcome to afp! This is a FAQ file for a long-overdue newsgroup called alt.flame.psychiatry (I guess you knew that). If there are any questions I haven't thought of, please write to me at pking@idirect.com 1. What is meant by "flame"? To insult and heap invective on someone, something, or an idea. But in psychiatric terms, to simply offer valid and balanced criticism of psychiatry is enough to pass as "flaming". Remember, good patients are totally uncritical, and valid, thoughtful critics of psychiatry are seen as hostile. 2. So, why flame psychiatrists? The short answer is because there are several factors that [remainder of text deleted by folder-shrink.pl]