From spp@psa.pencom.com	 Thu Oct  3 09:20:13 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id JAA07632; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 09:20:13 -0400
Received: from psa.pencom.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA02545; Thu, 3 Oct 96 09:19:37 EDT
Received: from psa.pencom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by psa.pencom.com (Hah!/nope) with ESMTP id IAA16220 for <news-answers-request@mit.edu>; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 08:19:34 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199610031319.IAA16220@psa.pencom.com>
To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [news.answers] comp.lang.perl.* FAQ 1/5 - Availability 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Oct 1996 21:28:45 EDT."
             <199610030128.VAA08934@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 1996 08:19:33 -0500
From: Stephen Potter <spp@psa.pencom.com>

Yes, it is still active.  For some definition of active.  Due to the time
constraints writing the new Camel, and real work/real life, have put on us
it has not been updated in close to a year.  However, it is in heavy
rewrite now that the Camel has been released.  New versions will be
available "soon".

-spp

Strange sunspot activity caused pgreene@mit.edu to write:
| [This message was generated semi-automatically.]
| 
| What's the current status of the posting
| "comp.lang.perl.* FAQ 1/5 - Availability" 
| (and the other parts)?
| The records which comprise the List of Periodic Informational
| Postings, which we try to keep updated, state that it should be posted
| bi-weekly,
| but as far as we can tell, it hasn't been posted since
| 27 Jan 1996.  Could you please let us know what's up?
| 
| Note that we're not trying to pressure you into posting it or anything
| like that; that's certainly not our prerogative.  We're just trying to
| verify that it's is still an active posting so that we can keep our
| records up-to-date.
| 
| Thanks!
| 
| - Pam Greene
| one of the *.answers moderators, news-answers-request@mit.edu
| 

