Replied: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 20:13:03 EDT Replied: "David Cassel " From destiny@crl.com Wed Oct 2 22:40:22 1996 Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id WAA13693; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 22:40:20 -0400 Received: from mail.crl.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA17660; Wed, 2 Oct 96 22:40:01 EDT Received: from crl.crl.com (crl.com) by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA25415 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Wed, 2 Oct 1996 19:40:15 -0700 Received: by crl.crl.com id AA07491 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for news-answers-request@mit.edu); Wed, 2 Oct 1996 19:26:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 19:26:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Cassel To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU Subject: Re: [news.answers] alt.aol-sucks FAQ Part 1/3 - Censorship In-Reply-To: <199610030120.VAA08370@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII An update is in progress, and a new FAQ-maintainer is being sought. It was felt better to discontinue posting of the old FAQ until the new FAQ could be completed. (It wasn't supposed to take this long. There should be some motion on this soon.) On Wed, 2 Oct 1996 pgreene@mit.edu wrote: > [This message was generated semi-automatically.] > > What's the current status of the posting > "alt.aol-sucks FAQ Part 1/3 - Censorship" > (and the other parts)? > The records which comprise the List of Periodic Informational > Postings, which we try to keep updated, state that it should be posted > monthly, > but as far as we can tell, it hasn't been posted since > 27 Mar 1996. Could you please let us know what's up? > > Note that we're not trying to pressure you into posting it or anything > like that; that's certainly not our prerogative. We're just trying to > verify that it's is still an active posting so that we can keep our > records up-to-date. > > Thanks! > > - Pam Greene > one of the *.answers moderators, news-answers-request@mit.edu > >