From asdamick@unity.ncsu.edu	 Thu Oct  3 06:27:33 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id GAA00758; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 06:27:30 -0400
Received: from n00040-104hlb.unity.ncsu.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA08436; Thu, 3 Oct 96 06:27:09 EDT
Received: by n00040-104hlb.unity.ncsu.edu (8.6.11/UC06jan95)
	id GAA10374; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 06:27:08 -0400
From: <asdamick@unity.ncsu.edu> (Andrew S. "Gurk" Damick)
Message-Id: <9610030627.ZM10372@unity.ncsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 06:27:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: pgreene@mit.edu
        "[news.answers] The BOB(c)FAQ" (Oct  2, 10:10pm)
References: <199610030210.WAA11765@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 10oct95)
To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [news.answers] The BOB(c)FAQ
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 2, 10:10pm, pgreene@mit.edu wrote:
> Subject: [news.answers] The BOB(c)FAQ
> [This message was generated semi-automatically.]
>
> What's the current status of the posting
> "The BOB(c)FAQ" ?

> Note that we're not trying to pressure you into posting it or anything
> like that; that's certainly not our prerogative.  We're just trying to
> verify that it's is still an active posting so that we can keep our
> records up-to-date.

Due to its subject taking on a radically different nomenclature and so forth,
the BOB(c)FAQ is now effectively defunct.  It may, in the future, be replaced
with the GurkFAQ, and there are plans in the works to do this, but, as of now,
as far as USENET is concerned, there is no more The BOB(c).


                                       --ASD

-- 
   A n d r e w  S .  " G u r k "  D a m i c k  Smerpological Prophet
   "I'm sorry, am I supposed to feel, oh, what is it you California 
     types like to say, 'dissed?'" -- Colin "Der S.I.N.S." Thacher