Replied: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 10:06:24 EDT Replied: "Rod Keller " From rkeller@netaxs.com Thu Oct 3 07:06:05 1996 Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id HAA01951; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 07:06:04 -0400 Received: from access.netaxs.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA12957; Thu, 3 Oct 96 07:05:36 EDT Received: from unix1.netaxs.com (rkeller@unix1.netaxs.com [207.8.186.3]) by access.netaxs.com (8.7.6/8.6.11) with ESMTP id HAA05354 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 07:05:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Rod Keller Received: (from rkeller@localhost) by unix1.netaxs.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA25697 for news-answers-request@mit.edu; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 07:05:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199610031105.HAA25697@unix1.netaxs.com> Subject: Re: [news.answers] Alt.religion.scientology FAQ for New Readers To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 07:05:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <199610030143.VAA09960@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU> from "pgreene@mit.edu" at Oct 2, 96 09:43:21 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text > What's the current status of the posting > "Alt.religion.scientology FAQ for New Readers" ? > The records which comprise the List of Periodic Informational > Postings, which we try to keep updated, state that it should be posted > bi-weekly, > but as far as we can tell, it hasn't been posted since > 14 Oct 1995. Could you please let us know what's up? > > Note that we're not trying to pressure you into posting it or anything > like that; that's certainly not our prerogative. We're just trying to > verify that it's is still an active posting so that we can keep our > records up-to-date. > > Thanks! > > - Pam Greene > one of the *.answers moderators, news-answers-request@mit.edu Hi Pam. I haven't maintained the file for some time now. A few months after I got it approved for your archive, events really started taking off on alt.religion.scientology, with numerous lawsuits by the Scientologists against critics. A static FAQ was not as useful as news about the happenings every week. I now produce "A.r.s Week in Review" which condenses the week's happenings into a managable review posting/email. It's archived at several sites in the US and Germany. What happens to FAQ's that are out of date?