Replied: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 19:56:48 EDT Replied: "jeffcox@zeta.org.au (Jeffrey Cox) " From jeffcox@godzilla.zeta.org.au Fri Oct 4 08:19:56 1996 Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id IAA19004; Fri, 4 Oct 1996 08:19:56 -0400 Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA07406; Fri, 4 Oct 96 08:16:25 EDT Received: from [203.2.228.226] (dialup62.syd1.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.226]) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA20166 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 1996 22:09:40 +1000 Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 22:09:40 +1000 X-Sender: jeffcox@godzilla.zeta.org.au (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU From: jeffcox@zeta.org.au (Jeffrey Cox) Subject: Re: talk.origins FAQ (Creation) 1 of 3 Hi Emily, >Hello, > >Sorry, I must have forgotten to include the relevant information. >Anyway, it really is included this time. :) Also, your part 3 looks >fine, except for the archive name. I'm sorry if I didn't make this >clear, but the archive name is supposed to be > >Archive-name: talk-origins/creation/part1 [...] > You have our approval for this posting (or set of postings) and >may start posting when you wish. Be sure to send your postings out by >using news, not by mailing them, and be sure that your news software >-uses- the approved headers, and doesn't just include them in the body >of the article. Use all the headers as they were approved, including >the full Newsgroups line. [..] I am ready to post this month's version of the FAQ, but I am a little uncertain about the header. I did some test posts on my local server and the returns I had in the header did not appear in the host. I have contacted the writer of my news software, John Norstad who is one of the leading authorities on macintoshes and the internet and he says: >Header lines are defined to end with the first empty line - that's what >separates the "header lines" from the "body lines". So there's no such >thing as "the main header ..., then a blank line, then the rest of the >header". I aso emailed my sysop, and he said: >Article (and message) headers can't contain blank lines. A blank line >is what separates the header from the body. So I think the exra header must go in the first part of the post followed by the second blank line, although this was not clear from the info you sent me (unless I missed a bit). My headers should look like this: **News Header: From: jeffcox@zeta.org.au (Jeffrey Cox) Reply-To: jeffcox@zeta.org.au (Jeffrey Cox) Subject: talk.origins FAQ (Creation) 1 of 3 Keywords: creation, evolution, abiogenesis Newsgroups: talk.origins,news.answers,talk.answers Followup-To: talk.origins Distribution: world Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU Summary: This posting contains a list of Frequently Asked Questions in the creation / evolution debate answered from a Christian point of view, including an outline of the Christian views, discussion of perceived flaws in abiogenesis and evolution and a detailed explanation of the old earth creation viewpoint. ** then the news software puts in a blank line. **Then the article parts begin: Archive-name: talk-origins/creation/part1 Posting-Frequency: monthly Last-modified: October 1 1996 Expires: 1996/11/07 Version: 1.7 URL: http://www.zeta.org.au/~jeffcox/creation.html The talk.origins FAQ (Creation) Homepage (Blank line.) Then the text of that part of the post. Is this OK?