From duke@tpsinc.com	 Mon Oct  7 09:58:27 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.6.13/2.3JIK) with SMTP id JAA08629; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 09:58:18 -0400
Received: from relay6.UU.NET by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA02289; Mon, 7 Oct 96 09:45:12 EDT
Received: from tpsinc.com by relay6.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: metro.tpsinc.com [198.4.67.100])
	id QQbkkc22207; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 09:44:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from menlo.tpsinc.com by tpsinc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA16422; Mon, 7 Oct 96 09:42:26 EDT
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 96 09:42:26 EDT
Message-Id: <9610071342.AA16422@tpsinc.com>
Received: by menlo.tpsinc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA03160; Mon, 7 Oct 96 09:42:22 EDT
From: Bob Robillard <duke@menlo.tpsinc.com>
To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <199610030042.UAA06088@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU> (pgreene@mit.edu)
Subject: Re: [news.answers] [rec.motorcycles.racing] How to Become a Motorcycle Roadracer, V3.9 (modified 17 June 96)
Reply-To: duke@tpsinc.com

>but as far as we can tell, it hasn't been posted since
>17 Jun 1996.  Could you please let us know what's up?

What's up is that I'm a lazy bastard.  :->  There haven't been 
any significant changes in a while, so I haven't gotten to it.
I'll make the effort this month.

But, yeah, it's still live.

Thanks for all your FAQ-work, incidentally!

Duke Robillard, duke@tpsinc.com


>Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 20:42:42 -0400
>From: pgreene@mit.edu
>Reply-To: news-answers-request@mit.edu
>
>[This message was generated semi-automatically.]
>
>What's the current status of the posting
>"[rec.motorcycles.racing] How to Become a Motorcycle Roadracer, V3.9 (modified 17 June 96)" ?
>The records which comprise the List of Periodic Informational
>Postings, which we try to keep updated, state that it should be posted
>monthly, near the 17th,
>but as far as we can tell, it hasn't been posted since
>17 Jun 1996.  Could you please let us know what's up?
>
>Note that we're not trying to pressure you into posting it or anything
>like that; that's certainly not our prerogative.  We're just trying to
>verify that it's is still an active posting so that we can keep our
>records up-to-date.
>
>Thanks!
>
>- Pam Greene
>one of the *.answers moderators, news-answers-request@mit.edu
>
>

