From james@corp.netcom.net.uk	 Fri Oct 25 06:46:36 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.7.6/2.3JIK) with SMTP id GAA27021; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 06:46:36 -0400
Received: from gatekeeper.corp.netcom.net.uk by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA11541; Fri, 25 Oct 96 06:45:47 EDT
Received: by gatekeeper.corp.netcom.net.uk; id LAA00842; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:45:45 +0100
Received: from Netcom by gatekeeper.corp.netcom.net.uk via smap (V3.1)
	id xma000834; Fri, 25 Oct 96 11:45:19 +0100
From: James Fidell <james@corp.netcom.net.uk>
Message-Id: <199610251045.LAA00091@corp.netcom.net.uk>
Subject: Re: [news.answers] COBOL FAQ
To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:45:17 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <199610011621.MAA21485@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU> from "pgreene@mit.edu" at Oct 1, 96 12:21:29 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

You wrote:

> What's the current status of the posting
> "COBOL FAQ" ?
> The records which comprise the List of Periodic Informational
> Postings, which we try to keep updated, that it should be posted
> every 30 days,
> but as far as we can tell, it hasn't been posted since
> 12 Feb 1996.  Could you please let us know what's up?

I've not had much time for these things over the last few months,
sadly.  I still wish to maintain the posting though and will be
starting again as soon as I can, though perhaps from a different
e-mail address.

James.
-- 
 "Yield to temptation --             | Work: james@corp.netcom.net.uk
  it may not pass your way again"    | Play: james@hermione.demon.co.uk
                                     | http://www.netcom.net.uk/~james/
        - Lazarus Long               |              James Fidell