From scivw@hitl.washington.edu	 Thu Jan 16 20:19:26 1997
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.7.6/2.3JIK) with SMTP id UAA15895; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 20:19:24 -0500
Received: from [128.95.73.60] by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA14984; Thu, 16 Jan 97 20:18:59 EST
Received: from stout.hitl.washington.edu (scivw@stout.hitl.washington.edu [128.95.74.41]) by near.hitl.washington.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA10454 for news-answers-request@mit.edu; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 17:18:59 -0800 (PST)
From: "Sci.Virtual-Worlds" <scivw@hitl.washington.edu>
Message-Id: <199701170118.RAA10454@near.hitl.washington.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: near.hitl.washington.edu: scivw@stout.hitl.washington.edu [128.95.74.41] didn't use HELO protocol
To: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Comment for moderators: [news.answers] approval 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Jan 97 15:22:50 EST."
             <199701162022.PAA02460@penguin-lust.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 97 17:18:57 -0800
X-Mts: smtp


>It isn't clear from your auto-rejection whether my previous message
>concerning approval of the "ADMIN:sci.virtual-worlds Reference FAQ"
>for posting to news.answers ever actually reached a human (although
>with a 20-day delay I suspect it did), particularly since hte
>"comments" line in the reply wasn't starred.

I'm quite sorry about this.  I'd like to blame it on being snowbound, my
exile without a computer, etc.  However, it's probably human error.

I didn't think a reply was necessary.  I made the changes per your
request and posted it this month with the correct header.

I also went back and re-read the guidelines and have since submitted
correctly my latest Visual FAQ.

I apologize again.  I appreciate your help and understanding.

Regards,

Toni Emerson
Moderator
sci.virtual-worlds